透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.33.41
  • 期刊

救災物資臨時集散場所選擇評估系統之建立

Relief Supply Collection and Distribution Site SelectionSystem

摘要


921大地震前我國以災後處理為主,災後逐漸著重於災前籌備、災害應變及計畫,如頒佈災害防救法與制定各級地區災害防救計畫,然物資傳遞問題仍未改善。物資儲備場所的選定,仍僅根據場所之安全性與空間使用來決定,未有一套評估標準。本研究建置一場所選擇評估系統,由訪談專家確立評估準則項目,利用問卷取得各項準則權重,了解各項評估準則對場所選擇影響程度,並透過程式設計系統操作介面,測試準則項目實用性。由於資料取得之限制,使用桃園縣場所面積400m^2以上之收容避難場所為系統測試資料。準則影響場所選擇之重要性與先後順序,第一層級之環境災害潛勢、交通因素與場所設施因素三者權重相當;而子層級中各以地震災害潛勢、連外道路可及性與場所特性之權重最高。

並列摘要


Disaster responsing has been taking attention rescently. We focus on dealing with the disaster responsding before 921 earthquake. After that, we start preparing and setting up rules of disaster in each area. The delivery problem still happened, the site selection based on the estimation of earthquake, the potential of disaster happening, and the equipment oaround the site.The purpose of the study is going to set up a stander criterion of site selection. There is no criterion could be followed for site selection. There are three steps used to set up the stander of site selection. First, the criterion was set up by visiting experts. The second one is getting the weight of each criteria with questionnary. The weight of criteria means the degree of influence. Finally, programming a system to present the arranging result. Because of the limitation of data, we use the shelters which have inner area over 400 m^2 in Tao Yaun as dataset.The weight of criterion shows the influence while selecting the site. Every criterion has close weight in the first layer. The potential of earthquake happening, the arriving feasibility and the facilities of site get the highest weight during the second layer.

並列關鍵字

AHP evaluative criteria expert system

延伸閱讀