現有專案管理服務計費方式之問題與解決方式

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONSOFEXISTED PAYMENT METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICE

徐朝聲(Chao-Sheng Hsu) ； 楊智斌(Jyh-Bin Yang) ； 鄭紹材(Shao-Tsai Cheng)

《營建管理季刊》 87期 (2011/08) Pp. 13-26

https://doi.org/10.6505/CMJ-2011-87-13-14

摘要

目前國內執行專案管理服務的許多工程顧問公司及建築師、技師事務所大多面臨所獲得的服務費用不足，但又無法事先提出執行相關工作所需的合理費用，以致委託技術服務契約採建造費用百分比法或總包價法等計費方式出現許多執行面問題。本研究針對某公司之公有建築承攬專案管理個案進行分析，原案例採用總包價法或建造費用百分比法計價，本研究則改採服務成本加公費法進行模擬，並配合實際資訊之輔助，以分析現有專案管理服務計費方式之問題。經個案分析與模擬，本研究認為服務成本加公費法較可反映服務廠商之成本支出。此外，本研究亦提出採用服務成本加公費時之配套措施，以做為日後採用服務成本加公費法參考。

關鍵字

專案管理 ； 計費辦法 ； 服務成本加公費法

並列摘要

Most of professional construction management (PCM) service providers, including engineering consultant, architects, and engineers firms, encounter that their service incomes are less than actual outcomes, but they cannot propose reasonable service fees in advance. Therefore, the common used payment methods for PCM service, the percentage of construction expense method and the lump sum method, encounter many implementation problems. This study analyzed and discussed on the cases of PCM service for public building construction, in which the percentage of construction expense method and the lump sum method are employed in service contracts. This study used the Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee (CPFF) payment method and information collected from real cases to simulate possible incomes and outcomes, and then discussed the problems existed in current payment methods. Based on the analysis and simulation on cases, this study concluded that the CPFF method is a suitable method to reflect service provider's actual cost outcomes. Furthermore, this study proposed some corresponding actions for using the CPFF method. Research results would be valuable for reference while using the CPFF method in the future.

並列關鍵字

Professional Construction Management ； Fee Calculation Regulations ； Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee