並列摘要
What is the relevance of organizing knowledge in distinct conceptual fields when everything has become cultural with no distinct areas anymore? Is, for example, Western traditional aesthetics as an autonomous cognitive discipline always relevant in the age of multiculturalism? This essay argues, albeit controversially, that the perspective of so-called cultural studies has opened new doors by adopting a more radically pluralistic and inclusive approach- one whereby aesthetic categories are thought in terms of cultural practices. Despite the many defects of such culture-related studies- such as their eclecticism, lack of scientific rigor, or methodological unreliability- the challenges of today's multicultural society demand that we pay more attention at all levels to the roles played by difference and dialogue with otherness. This includes overcoming any form of ethnocentricity in our cognitive cultural disciplines; incorporating new topical horizons, whether economic, political or social; and rethinking the very nature of value, meaning and way of life.
並列關鍵字
無資料被引用紀錄
延伸閱讀
- 林志銘（2017）。From the Aesthetics Experience to the Aesthetics of Public's。公共藝術簡訊，(140)，18-21。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20140328001-201712-201712060008-201712060008-18-21
- 林榮泰、林伯賢（2009）。A Study of Integrating Culture and Aesthetics to Promote Cultural and Creative Industries。藝術學報，(85)，81-105。https://doi.org/10.6793/JNTCA.200910.0081
- 黃熙宗（2001）。Craft, Art, and Aesthetics。視覺藝術，(4)，165-176。https://doi.org/10.6960/VA.200105.0165
- Leddy, T. (2011). Everyday Aesthetics and the Sublime. Aesthetic Pathways, 1(2), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.29431/AP.201106.0002
- 宋秀娟、劉秋固、謝朝鐘（2011）。A Study of Aesthetic and Life Education。大葉大學通識教育學報，(8)，89-101。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=20713673-201112-201204130002-201204130002-90-102