並列摘要
My comments are divided into three parts. First, I argue that we need to emphasize the plurality of traditional Chinese thoughts, not only Confucianism. I am inclined to think that traditional Mohist thoughts (墨家思想), in its practical dimensions, are akin to contemporary human rights idea and practice. If we adopt such a position, it should be easier to engage in the dialogue with the western thoughts. Secondly, I argue we need to study more carefully the impact of John Dewey on Chinese educational system. During the early decade of the 20th century, war, civil war and revolution made it difficult, if not impossible, to put John Dewey's philosophy into practice. Lastly, I don't think we have such an easy time in promoting human rights education in Taiwan. It was only in the past ten years that modest progress has been made. It's future is still quite uncertain.
延伸閱讀
- Yang, R. S. (2004). 評論：. Formosan Journal of Surgery, 37(3), 110-110. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10116788-200406-37-3-110-110-o
- （2007）。評論文章。表演藝術年鑑，()，361-368。https://doi.org/10.29528/PAY.200709.0012
- 雷敦龢（2011）。評論文章。台灣人權學刊，1(1)，135-142。https://doi.org/10.29733/THRJ.201112.0006
- （2012）。評論文章。表演藝術年鑑，()，315-338。https://doi.org/10.29528/PAY.201209.0013
- 林正弘（2011）。評論文章。台灣人權學刊，1(1)，145-150。https://doi.org/10.29733/THRJ.201112.0007