透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.21.5
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

災後文化與產業復原之「更耐災的重建」分析:以逐鹿部落的觀光發展為例

"Build Back Better" Through Post-Disaster Cultural and Livelihood Recovery: A Case Study of Tourism Development at Poftonga Veoveo

摘要


當前國內之災後復原研究,多著重於硬體重建成果之評估而欠缺對復原歷程中社會韌性的探討,本研究以質性觀點探討原住民部落災後異地重建的文化與產業發展,以理解更耐災的重建(build back better)之內涵。研究發現,以觀光做為產業復原主軸的鄒族逐鹿部落,因遊客的異文化獵奇心態與部落永久屋現代化營造之不一致,導致推行傳統文化觀光的過程產生矛盾。此外,公部門的各項部落產業復原政策,也因無法持續執行而淪為口號。在硬體重建中,雖以原民文化為設計核心能提升社會凝聚力,但卻囿於空間規劃使得發展受限,進而造成人口流失與產業復原遲滯。研究建議災後復原如欲使部落更耐災,則應將重建政策深化至居民生活,使之有文化性地長期維持居民生計,以增加異地重建部落的韌性。

並列摘要


At present, the post-disaster recovery research in Taiwan focuses on the evaluation of hardware reconstruction achievements and lacks the discussion of social resilience in the recovery process. This study used qualitative research methods to explore the connotations of the build back better based on cultural, tourism development and reconstruction conducted by an indigenous tribe in a relocated site. Research findings revealed that the post-disaster recovery in Poftonga Veoveo has been based on tourism; the discrepancy between the permanent houses constructed during reconstruction and the exotic culture and sense of adventure expected by tourists resulted in contradictions during promotions of indigenous culture-oriented tourism. Government agencies have proposed various recovery policies, which have failed to become concrete actions because of a failure to implement them consistently. Hardware reconstruction employing indigenous culture as the core of its design yielded tangible benefits, such as enhancing social cohesion and resilience. However, spatial planning restricted tribal development and resulted in population loss, which affected the development of the tribal tourism industry. The results of this study suggest that if want the post-disaster tribe more resilient, should make recovery policy be extended to cover residents' lives. Such indigenous culture-oriented tourism can help sustain residents' livelihoods in the long term, thereby increasing the sustainability of relocated tribe.

參考文獻


吳宗瓊,2003,〈部落觀光與生態旅遊〉,《農業經營管理會訊》,35 期: 頁 15-18。doi:10.6370/NYCYKLHH.200304.0015
侯宜凱、梁炳琨,2010,〈原住民族地區觀光與地方發展之研究—以鄒族來吉部落為例〉,《臺灣原住民族研究季刊》,3 卷 1 期:頁 105-148。doi:10.29910/TJIS.201003.0004
Adger, W. N. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24: 347-364. doi:10.1191/030913200701540465
Alexander, D. E. 2013. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13: 2707-2716. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
Francis, T., Wilkinson, S., Mannakkara, S., & Chang-Richards, A. 2018. Post-disaster reconstruction in Christchurch: A “build back better” perspective. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9: 239-248. doi:10.1108/IJDRBE-01-2017-0009

被引用紀錄


張育銘、林貝珊(2022)。以韌性觀點探討土石流災後復原與生計:以嘎色鬧部落的露營觀光為例災害防救科技與管理學刊11(2),59-73。https://doi.org/10.6149/JDM.202209_11(2).0004

延伸閱讀