摘要
奧林匹克運動會一向以光鮮亮麗的形象出現在螢光幕是，而忽略背後所隱藏的潛在問題。本文主旨在探討奧運會在政治角力、商業化、環境保護及選手競爭等不同面向的輸家，藉由文獻蒐集、閱讀、分析、整理及詮釋，而獲得以下結論：一、自現代奧運會復甦以來政治議題困擾不斷，更嚴峻的挑戰奧林匹克憲章，國際奧委會總是屈服強權之下而犧牲弱小國家及弱勢族群。二、奧運會的龐大商機已引起商業界的覬覦，由於主辦國為提升國際形象及盈收而擴大建設，導致資本家剝削窮人、流浪漢等弱勢固體及環境生態的破壞。三、奧運會的宗昌在於提供人類身心的健康，但是許多選手為追求金錢報償而失去健康，激烈競賽促使選手不惜使用禁藥而成為最大的輸家。
並列摘要
The Olympic Games always appear by the attractive sharp image on the screen, but overlook the hidden problem. This purpose of article is discussing the loser of Olympic Games which in the strength of political, the commercialization, the environmental protection and the competition of player etc, according to collecting literature, reading, analysis, arrangement and interpretation, obtains following conclusion: 1. The political subject puzzle unceasingly since the modem Olympic Games has recovered, and the sterner challenge the Olympic charter, IOC always submits under the might to sacrifices the weak countries and the weak race. 2. Olympic Games' huge business opportunity has caused commerce coveting, because the host country expands the construction for promotes international image and increases profits, causes the capitalist exploits poor person and tramp's minority group and ecocide. 3. The Olympic Games' objective offers human body and mind's health, but many players lose health for the money of compensation, the intense competition urges the players to use the inhibitive drugs become the biggest loser.
延伸閱讀
- 高俊雄（2000）。奧林匹克運動會-社會科學的觀點。大專體育，(48)，28-28。https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.2000.48.11
- 廖俊儒、程紹同（2012）。申辦大型國際運動賽會成功與失敗因素之研究。臺灣體育學術研究，(52)，81-96。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.2012.06.04
- 陳金盈、何金樑、沈莉青（2007）。從國際趨勢探討我國奧運奪金策略方向。國立金門技術學院學報，(2)，91-97。https://doi.org/10.7057/JNKIT.200702.0091
- 李世昌、羅明葵、林聰哲（2008）。運動賽會對國家發展運動觀光之探討－以奧運會為例。載於台灣生態休閒產業管理學會（主編），運動休閒產業管理學術研討會論文集（頁158-165）。台灣生態休閒產業管理學會。https://doi.org/10.29463/2008chanye.200804.0158
- 唐千茹（2015）。＂Win＂ and ＂Lose＂ in the World of Sports: Debating on the Values。運動文化研究，(26)，51-69。https://doi.org/10.29818/SS.201506_(26).0002