透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.9.146
  • 期刊

2002年亞運會與2003年全運會男子競技體操地板項目加分動作編排之探討

Compare 2002 Asia Game with 2003 National Game of Elite Men's Artistic Gymnastics of Routine on Floor Exercise

摘要


本研究之目的在於探討參加2002年亞運會與2003年全運會,男子競技體操地板項目決賽選手共16人次所實施完成的整套動作內容中加分動作之編排,運用影片觀察法以描述統計進行分析,本研究獲得結果如下: 一、全運會選手在整套動作中完成單獨動作加分的次數遠低於運會選手,在組合動作加分及難度提昇動作兩部分的次數亦少於亞運會選手。 二、全運會選手在連結動作加分次數及連結加分總分值兩部分皆低於亞運會選手。全運會選手在整套動作中缺乏D級+E級連接動作次數。

關鍵字

競技體操 地板

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to compare 2002 Asian Games and 2003 National Games in the men's artistic gymnastics floor exercise category. A total of sixteen athlete's performance was recorded during the floor exercise finals of Men's Artistic Gymnastics Competition in both the 2002 Asian Games and 2003 National Games. Through this analysis, we get a better understanding of the male gymnast's floor exercise thereby helping coaches to determine the levels of training. The findings were as follows: 1. On frequency of difficult elements for Bonus Points, domestic gymnasts were lower than Asian elite gymnasts. The direct connection for Bonus Points and the direct connection of two acrobatic elements create one single value, domestic gymnasts also were lower than Asian elite gymnasts. 2. On frequency of direct connection difficult elements for Bonus Points and sum of Bonus Points, domestic gymnasts were lower than Asian elite gymnasts. They were lack D-part and E-parts elements of connection in their performance of Men's Artistic Gymnastics Competition of the 2003 National Game.

參考文獻


林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華書局。
俞智贏(1988)。男子體操加分技能及成績分析-86年台灣區運動會體操賽男子第工競賽。體育學報。26輯,105-212。
陳漢棟(1999)。我國大專組與高中組男子體操選手整套動作起評分的比較分析。台東師院學報。10,237-255。
陳光輝、陳嘉遠、蔡亨(2005)。2003年世界體操錦標賽中華男子代表隊團體預賽成績分析。國立體育學院論叢。16(1),31-39。
陳光輝、陳嘉遠、蔡亨(2006)。男子競技體操賽高難度動作出現次數對整套動作起評分影響之分析。國立體育學院論叢

延伸閱讀