透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.110.119
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

培力社區參與家暴防治預防性工作之經驗初探:以彰化縣政府「社區紮根」模式為例

Exploratory Research on the Experiences of Empowering Community to Participate in Domestic Violence Prevention Work: The Case of "Community-Based Building Model" of Changhua County Government

摘要


隨著「家庭暴力防治法」的制定與實施,家暴通報案件逐年增加,然而家暴發生的原因複雜,防治工作難度高,因此中央政府近幾年致力於全國推動以社區為主體的家暴防治預防性方案,持續挹注經費與資源,鼓勵社區辦理適合在地特色與需求的家暴防治預防宣導方案,以喚起民眾共同關心家暴議題,期望能將家暴零容忍的意識於社區紮根。地方政府則需協辦,擔負培力在地社區參與的重要角色。然而「培力」的內涵應為何?地方政府如何推動社區參與家暴防治預防性工作?為回答上述問題,本研究以彰化縣政府運用「社區紮根」模式培力社區參與家暴防治預防性工作的經驗為例,並採用焦點團體收集相關資料。研究發現,立基於社區優勢的理念,彰化縣政府成立專責培力小組,透過逐步與社區工作的過程形成「社區紮根」模式,此模式由「社區招募考量意願與能力」、「啟發社區防暴意識」、「防暴培力師進駐博暖」、「共學平台悉心營造」、「母雞帶小雞以經驗傳承」、以及「大專生洄游注入活力」等六大策略堆砌而成。然推動過程中亦面臨困境,包括「難以招募社區參與家暴防治預性工作」、「因幹部不合或更換而影響培力推展」以及「專責培力小組角色受到質疑」。本研究結果期能作為未來地方政府推展社區參與家暴防治之施政作為與實務運作的參考與借鏡。

並列摘要


With the enactment and enforcement of the Domestic Violence Prevention Act, the reports of domestic violence had been increasing year by year. Carrying out prevention work was quite challenging due to the fact that there was no single cause leading to domestic violence. The central authority, therefore, had recently been making efforts in conducting community-driven domestic violence prevention projects by pouring money and resources with a hope that the awareness of "zero tolerance for violence" could be build grassrootsly and culture myth could be broken. The co-organizer was the local government taking responsibility for empowering the community to participate in domestic violence prevention work. However, what were the contents of "empowerment"? What kinds of strategies were used by the local government to empower the community? To answer these questions and purpose recommendations for further formulation of policies, the case of "community-based building model" of Changhua County Government was explored in this study. Research data was collected by conducting a focus group. The results first showed that the "community-based building model" was based on the community strengths perspective and had been constructed gradually. The one responsible for this was a special empowerment team formed by Changhua County Government. Further exploring the contents of the "community-based building model", it was found that the special empowerment team adopted 6 strategies to empower local communities to participate in domestic violence prevention work, including: "recruitment should consider the community's intention and capacity", "community's anti-domestic violence consciousness should be inspired", "anti-domestic violence empowerment groups should be set up so that they could cultivate themselves with communities", "developing co-learning platforms enabling communities to learn from each other", "making well-empowered communities to assist less ones", and "using college student resources". During the empowerment process, some difficulties might be encountered, such as recruiting communities was hard, community empowerment might be interfered, and the role of the special empowerment team was queried.

參考文獻


李怡娟、葉若分、張麗春(2003)。建構賦權式以社區為基礎的獨居老人照護模式。護理雜誌,50(3),49-55。doi: 10.6224/JN.50.3.49
游美貴(2014)。臺灣家庭暴力防治服務方案的實施與轉變之探討。臺大社會工作學刊,29,53-96。doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2014.29.02
羅秀華(2001)。社區充權的行動研究—以木新永安組織經驗為例。臺大社會工作學刊,5,151-195。doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2001.05.04
Itzhaky, H and Bustin, E. (2002) Strengths and Pathological Perspectives in Community Social Work, Journal of Community Practice, 10(3), pp. 1-73. doi: 10.1300/J125v10n03 04
Conyers, D. and Cumanzala, F. (2004) Community Empowerment and Democracy in Zimbabwe: A Case Study from Binga District, Social Policy & Administration, 38(4), pp. 383-398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00397.x

被引用紀錄


黃珮玲(2020)。草根組織之性別平等倡議策略探討-以新北市為例社會發展研究學刊(25),1-40。https://doi.org/10.6687/JSDS.202003_(25).0001

延伸閱讀