台灣團體諮商研究之題材與方法之整合性分析：以2001－2012為例

A Review Study of Group Counseling Research between 2001 and 2012 in Taiwan

許智傑(Chih-Chieh Hsu) ； 謝政廷(Cheng-Ting Hsieh) ； 吳秀碧(Sophia Woo)

《臺灣諮商心理學報》 2卷2期 (2014/09) Pp. 49-75

摘要

本研究旨在針對2001－2012年期間台灣團體諮商研究的研究題材與研究方法進行整合性分析探究。研究者在「台灣博碩士論文系統網」、「台灣期刊論文索引系統」兩個資料庫，以「團體諮商」、「團體領導者」、「諮商團體」三個關鍵字，搜尋與團體諮商相關的研究或論文作為研究分析之資料。為使研究資料能更貼近研究目的、回應研究問題，研究者設定三項排除條件：（1）論文或研究出版時間早於2001年，以及晚於2012年；（2）內容屬於團體治療或團體心理治療主題；（3）非實徵研究型的文獻回顧或文獻論述文章。只要符合其中一項，即將該篇文獻排除在本研究以外。經篩選後，共得124篇團體諮商研究作為本研究的分析資料。研究者結合共識質化研究的分析方法，針對124篇團體諮商的研究進行文獻的整合性分析。研究結果的發現共可分成兩部份：（1）在研究題材方面的發現，研究對象以團體成員為主，團體領導者次之；研究對象所屬族群，則以國小學童最多，國中生次之，老人最少；在研究主題方面，與領導相關的主題以團體諮商理論取向居多，與團體成員相關的研究主題以團體成員適應相關議題最多；（2）在研究取向方面，以效果研究最多，歷程研究次之；最後，在研究方法方面，以混合方法最多，量化研究次之，質化研究第三。詳細研究結果與研究建議則於內文中討論。

關鍵字

團體諮商 ； 團體研究 ； 文獻回顧分析

並列摘要

This article provides an integrative review of group counseling research conducted in Taiwan between 2001 and 2012. Particularly the main interest and focus of the study were on the topics and methodology of these research papers. Three keywords of group counseling, group leaders, and counseling group were used to conduct the search in the ＂National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan＂ and ＂PerioPath Index to Taiwan Periodical Literature System.＂ In addition, three exclusion criteria were set to screen the identified research articles. A total number of 124 research papers were selected and analyzed, and the percentages of each purposeful category were calculated. The results indicated that the most frequent participants in these researches were group members and then group leaders. Among age levels of research participants, elementary school children were the biggest group examined followed by junior high school students, and then seniors. Research topics focused mostly on theories of group counseling. The most popular research method applied in these group counseling research papers was mixed-method with quantitative research being the second, and qualitative research being the least popular. In addition, there were far more the outcome research papers than process research papers. According to these findings, detailed results and suggestions for further research are discussed.

並列關鍵字

group counseling ； group research ； literature review study

參考文獻

Hill, C. E., & Corbett, M. M. (1993). A perspective on the history of process and outcome research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(1), 3-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.40.1.3

Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517-572. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001

Hill, C., Knox, S., Thompson, B., Williams, E., Hess，S., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research : An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196-205. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Llewelyn, S. P., Elliott, R., Shapiro, D. A., Hardy, G., & Firth-Cozens, J. (1988). Client perceptions of significant events in prescriptive and exploratory period of individual therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychotherapy, 27, 105-114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00758.x