並列摘要
This article analyzes the difficulties encountered by non-Western psychologists in constructing theories of indigenous psychologies by the approach of naïve positivism. In order to overcome the difficulties the author argues that it is necessary for indigenous psychologists to construct theories which may represent universal mind of human beings as well as the particular mentalities of people living in a specific culture. Such theories may be used as framework to develop empirical-analytical, historical hermeneutic and critical sciences simultaneously (Habermas, 1968).
被引用紀錄
葉寶玲（2011）。華人家庭倫理脈絡下諮商師透過個人心理治療與母親情感關係改變之研究〔博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315230448
延伸閱讀
- 楊國樞（1997）。心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題。本土心理學研究，(8)，75-120。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10298282-199712-x-8-75-120-a
- 李維倫（2017）。華人本土心理學的文化主體策略。本土心理學研究，(47)，3-79。https://doi.org/10.6254/2017.47.3
- 潘啟聰（2014）。略論文藝心理學本土化的發展。鵝湖月刊，(474)，31-40。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18133738-201412-201502020063-201502020063-31-40
- Yang, K. S. (2012). Indigenous Psychology, Westernized Psychology, and Indigenized Psychology: A Non-Western Psychologist's View. 長庚人文社會學報, 5(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.30114/CGJHSS.201204.0001
- 張耀宗、劉怡秀（2020）。Spirituality and Early Childhood Education of Indigenous People。慈濟大學教育研究學刊，(15)，69-86。https://doi.org/10.6754/TCUJ.202004_(15).0003