- 期刊
探討不同接觸類型選手面臨挑釁的行為反應
The Neurophysiological Responses to Laboratory-Induced Aggression in the Different Physical Contact Types Athletes
摘要
在運動場上偶有暴力衝突事件，運動員的情緒是影響表現關鍵因素之一，過往對運動攻擊的研究多以問卷訪談為主，而無較具體表達選手情緒變化的相關資料。本研究目的透過行為實驗的分析來探討不同接觸類型的選手遭受到挑釁時產生行為上的差異。35位大專院校學生年齡在18－24歲之間，分別為接觸組（籃球）、非接觸組（排球）和控制組，其中實驗組皆有兩年以上的訓練及比賽經驗，而控制組則為一般無訓練競賽經驗之大學生。實驗步驟分別為先參與泰勒攻擊行為作業的執行之後再填寫競賽攻擊性及生氣量表。研究結果顯示：三組在競賽攻擊性及生氣量表無組間差異，且在泰勒攻擊作業上敵意、主動及反應攻擊分數亦無組間差異。但在泰勒作業－攻擊階段的表現上，接觸組和控制組有顯著組內差異，非接觸組未達顯著。本研究結論：從量表的分數和行為資料的分數上，三組無顯著差異，顯示參與比賽環境和運動訓練不會使運動員比一般人更具有攻擊性。從組別與攻擊階段的交互作用來看，非接觸組遭遇挑釁情況的行為反應相較接觸組和控制組不顯著，反映出非接觸型運動的特性，較不易受到挑釁行為影響。是否意味著非接觸組面臨挑釁行為非接觸類型的運動選手有更好的情緒調，仍需要做更進一步的探討。
並列摘要
The methodology for previous studies of aggression in sport context mainly used questionnaires and interviews. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of neurophysiological responses to laboratory-Induced aggression between Physical Contact and non- Physical Contact Athletes. Method: A total of 35 university students age range from 18~24 years were recruited from basketball players, volleyball players, and control group to perform Taylor aggression paradigm first and followed by filling in an Angry questionnaire. Results: There were no significant differences in aggressive scores and angry scores among three groups. In the Taylor aggression task, there were no significant differences in aggressive scores of hostile, proactive and reactive among three groups. However, there was significant interaction effect between groups and attack level. In the Taylor aggression task there were significant differences on attack level in physical contact group and control group. The higher punish level had higher reactive scores. Conclusions: 1. Sport training will not aggravate athletes' aggressive behavior. 2. The higher attack level caused higher punish reaction (reactive scores) in physical contact group and control group indicated that these two groups need to have better emotion regulation education when they face highly aggressive context.
延伸閱讀
- 張哲千、許哲禕、王駿濠（2018）。以事件相關電位探討網球運動員與非運動員在動作準備能力的表現差異之神經機制。體育學報，51(1)，59-71。https://doi.org/10.3966/102472972018035101005
- 王素芸（2010）。實習教師準師生衝突與因應策略之探究。中等教育，61(1)，74-95。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10180230-201003-201310210001-201310210001-74-95
- 黃翠紋、林淑君（2016）。高危機親密關係暴力事件特性與處遇作為之分析。犯罪學期刊，19(1)，20-58。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000189-201612-201703070013-201703070013-20-58
- 林貴滿、張淑真、錢美容、蔡鴻儒、張艾玲（2010）。探討影響急診護理人員對婚姻暴力創傷照護知識、態度和行爲意向因素。領導護理，11(2)，19-31。https://doi.org/10.29494/LN.201008.0004
- 潘賢章、林正常、林信甫（2006）。The Effects of Respiratory Muscle warm-up on Physiological Responses and Exhaustion Time in Cycling。臺大體育學報，()，39-53。https://doi.org/10.6569/NTUJPE.200609_(9).0003