兩岸醫事仲裁制度之比較研究

Comparative Study on the Medical Arbitration Legal System at Both Sides of Taiwan Strait

王國成(Kuo-Cheng Wang)

《北台灣中醫醫學雜誌》 4卷2期 (2012/12) Pp. 47-72

https://doi.org/10.30127/BTWZYYXZZ.201212.0005

摘要

我國仲裁法第1條即開宗明義指出對於依法得和解之現在或將來之爭議，當事人得訂立仲裁協議；第2條規定仲裁協議非關於一定之法律關係，及由該法律關係所生之爭議而為者不生效力。醫療糾紛爭議符合上述要件，是以除了和解、調解、調處、訴訟程序外，亦得選擇仲裁機制解決自不待言。兩岸由於政治因素長期隔閡，對於醫療糾紛處理分別發展出不同法制；繼1992年7月31日我國《兩岸人民關係條例》第74條及1998年大陸最高人民法院《關於人民法院認可台灣地區有關法院民事判决的决議》相繼公佈後，兩岸民事裁判有條件相互認可法制已成立，兩岸間人民發生醫療賠償糾紛尋求醫事仲裁認可解決當為未來發展之新趨勢。然而在當前兩岸醫事仲裁制度實務準則尚未建立及學說仍分岐之情形下，如何化解彼此爭議尋求共識以謀求兩岸人民福祇，實為執政者未來努力之目標。

並列摘要

According to the Arbitration Law of ROC, Article 1 shows about parties to a dispute arising at present or in the future may enter into an arbitration agreement designating a single arbitrator or an odd number of arbitrators to constitute an arbitral tribunal to determine the dispute. Another ,Article 2 shows that no arbitration agreement shall be valid unless it was entered in respect of a legal relationship or a dispute thereto. The resolution of medical dispute comply with the above conditions, so that it could choice the arbitration legal system to resolute the medical dispute except reconciliation, conciliation, mediation and proceedings.Because long-term estrangement across the Taiwan Strait due to political factors, so that each developed different legal systems for solving medical malpractice. After succession announce of Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area(Article 74) in 1992 and the resolution approved by the People's Court of Mainland about the Civil judgment of the Court of Taiwan in 1998, the legal systems with conditional mutual recognition about Civil judgment across the Taiwan Strait have been set up. The medical compensation dispute across the Taiwan Strait which solved by the medi- cal arbitration is a new trend in the future.However, because the medical arbitration systems across the Taiwan Strait have not yet been established and doctrine is still in diverged situation, how to resolve their dispute to seek a consensus in order to seek the blessing for the people across the Taiwan Strait which is the future effects of rulers.