影響高中學生學習表現之研究

A Study of Affecting Learning Performance of Junior High School Students

張芃婕(Peng-Jie Zhang) ； 鄭宇庭(Yu-Ting Cheng)

《Journal of Data Analysis》 12卷6期 (2017/12) Pp. 47-59

https://doi.org/10.6338/JDA.201712_12(6).0003

摘要

本研究以105學年度全國高二普通科學生為分析對象，將學生特性歸類為行為學習投入、情緒學習投入、認知學習投入與人口統計變項。首先透過統計分析了解資料之特性，接續採用卡方檢定，以篩選重要之變項，而後再以分類決策樹模型，分別針對不同學習表現之學生建構其模型，以釐清各學習表現之學生特性。研究結果發現，高二學生之情緒學習投入與行為學習投入向度較為顯著；而高度學習表現之學生對學校課程感興趣程度有明顯的特性；中度學習表現之學生在課外閱讀、社團和運動方面，投入程度較為明顯；對於低度學習表現之學生，在課程感興趣程度及自我期許上，有其明顯特性。研究結果可提供高中教育教學實務之參考。

關鍵字

決策樹分析 ； 高中教育 ； 學習表現 ； 學習投入

並列摘要

This study analyzes the senior high students of general education in second grade in 2015 academic year all over the country, and the variables of student characteristics are divided into behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, and demographic variables. First, the distribution of student characteristics, measured by this research definition, is used to realize the patterns of data. Choosing the important variables by the Chi-square test. And then, using the decision tree analysis to construct three models of learning performance to clarify the student characteristics in different models. The results show that the dimensions of emotional engagement and behavioral engagement are more significant；For the students in high-end learning performance, the pattern of level interest for lessons in schools is obvious； The level of engagement on extracurricular reading, club, and exercise for the students in mid-level learning performance is significant.；For the students in low-end learning performance, the patterns of level interest for lessons in schools and self-expectations are obvious. The results of the study would provide some reference for teaching in senior high school.

並列關鍵字

Decision tree analysis ； High school education ； Learning performance ； Learning engagement

參考文獻

余民寧(2006)。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究雙月刊。73，11-2。

張春興(1998)。現代心理學。台北市:東華。

Appleton, J.J.,Christenson, S. L.,Furlong, M. J.(2008).Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct.Psychology in the Schools.45(5),380.

Carini, R. M.,Kuh, G. D.,Klein, S. P.(2006).Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages.Research in Higher Education.47(1),1-32.

Harper, S. R.(Ed.),Quaye, S. J.(Ed.)(2009).Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations.New York, NY:Routledge.