女子籃球進攻戰術之亞太區與美洲區差異分析

The Difference between Asia/Oceania region and Americas region in Basketball Offensive Tactics

劉惠茹(Hui-Ju Liu) ； 梁嘉音(Chia-Yin Liang)

《運動表現期刊》 8卷2期 (2021/09) Pp. 73-86

https://doi.org/10.3966/240996512021090802002

摘要

目的：本研究旨在探究奧運資格賽女子籃球進攻戰術的進攻次數、進攻時間、命中率以及成功率的分佈，並分析亞太區與美洲區，以及勝負結果在進攻型態的差異情形。方法：以亞太區和美洲區奧運資格賽的女子籃球隊伍為觀察對象，分析半場戰術之組織進攻情形，共計24場賽事，紀錄進攻次數、進攻時間、進攻型態等內容，所得資料以描述性統計和重複數量二因子變異數分析進行分析。結果：（一）亞太區的進攻次數在組織式最多，平均17.17次，美洲區為自由式最多，平均23.7次；亞太區和美洲區的進攻時間皆在組織式時間最長（11.88秒、11.47秒），循環式時間最短（3.61秒、4.41秒）；命中率是兩區組織式的二分命中率最高（38.04%、36.21%），三分命中率（30.83%、36.21%）與成功率亦是兩區組織式最高（32.08%、37.33%）。（二）在亞太與美洲區進攻型態差異，進攻次數、進攻時間及命中率皆無達到顯著差異，僅成功率有達顯著差異，且美洲區組織式及循環式高於亞太區，亞太區則是自由式高於美洲區。（三）勝負在進攻型態差異，交互作用未達到顯著差異，而進攻型態在各變項皆有達到顯著差異。結論：（一）亞太區進攻型態以組織式次數為最多，美洲區則是自由式，進攻時間、二分命中率、三分命率及成功率兩個賽區皆以組織式為最高。（二）美洲區的組織式與循環式在成功率皆優於亞太區，而亞太區僅自由式成功率高於美洲區，進攻次數、進攻時間及命中率兩個賽區則不相上下。（三）二分命中率、三分命中率以及成功率會影響勝負結果。

關鍵字

籃球 ； 組織戰 ； 進攻型態 ； 成功率 ； 命中率

並列摘要

Purpose: This study was to explore the numbers of offensive attacks, offensive time, shooting percentage and success rate of women's basketball offensive tactics in the Women's Olympic qualifying tournament. In addition, further analysis was performed to identify the difference between the regions and win-lose outcome on offensive patterns. Methods: Data were collected during the 2020 FIBA Women's Olympic Pre-Qualifying Tournament (Asia/Oceania and Americas). Twenty-four matches were observed and parameters were measured through videotapes. The measures included the number of attacks, offensive time and offensive patterns by each set play in half-court. Descriptive statistics and a two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to test the difference between regions and win-lose outcome. Results: (a) The Asia/Oceania region had the highest number of attacks in the set play offense, with an average of 17.17 times, while the Americas region showed the highest number in the motion offense with an average of 23.7 times. Both the Asia/Oceania and the Americas regions spent the longest time in the set play offense (11.88s and 11.47s, respectively), while the continuity pattern was the shortest (3.61s and 4.41s, respectively). The two-point field-goal percentages (38.04% and 36.21%), three-point field-goal percentages (30.83% and 36.21%) and success rate (32.08% and 37.33%) were the highest in the set play offense in both the Asia/Oceania and the Americas, respectively. (b) Only the success rate showed significant difference between two regions. No significance was found in offense patterns, number of attacks, offense time and shooting percentages. The success rate of the set play and continuity patterns in the Americas region was higher than the Asia/Oceania region, while the Asia/Oceania region had higher success rate in the motion pattern in comparison with the Americas region. (c) No interaction effect between win-lose outcome and offensive patterns were observed, but two-point field-goal percentage, three-point field-god percentage and success rate had significant different in main effect in win-lose outcome. Offensive patterns had significant difference in each variable. Conclusion: The Asia/Oceania region showed the highest number of attacks in the set play, while the Americas region performed the highest attack times in the motion offense. The offensive time, two-point field-goal and three-point field-goal percentages, and success rate were highest in the set play offense in both regions compared to other offensive patterns. The Americas region had higher success rate in set play and continuity patterns, while the Asia/Oceania had better success rate in motion offense. The win-lose outcome was related to two-point field goal percentage, three-point field-goal percentage, and success rate.

並列關鍵字

basketball ； set play ； offensive patterns ； success rate ； shooting percentage

參考文獻

王凱新、劉有德 (2017)。探討傳球對於不同進攻策略及出手位置之關係：以超級籃球聯賽第十季為例。運動教練科學期刊，48，55-63。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2017.48.06。

藍于青、劉有德 (2019)。傳球對籃球比賽得分貢獻之分析。臺灣運動心理學報，19(1)，59-73。https://doi.org/10.6497/BSEPT.201905_19(1).0004。

Bazanov, B., Vóhandu, P., & Haljand, R. (2006). Factors influencing the teamwork intensity in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 6(2), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2006.11868375。

Csataljay, G. O’Donoghue, P, Hughes, & Dancs, H. (2009). Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868464。

García, J., Ibanez, J., Gómez, M. A., & Sampaio, J. (2014). Basketball game-related statistice discriminating ACB league teams according to game location, game outcome and final score differences. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(2), 443-452.https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868733。