為因應全球暖化之危機,各國無不盡力制訂或研擬減碳政策,並建立相關法制。台灣向來係以「非附件一國家」自居,仍持續制訂許多氣候變遷政策,以履行其國際減碳責任。2008年研提之永續能源政策綱領,即為代表。近來備受世界矚目之第十五屆聯合國氣候變遷會議哥本哈根會議為例,雖並未確定各國的減排目標,但非附件一國家被要求需提出國家適當減緩行動。台灣也追隨此一方向,研提我國國家適當減緩行動,並成立行政院節能減碳推動會及頒佈國家節能減碳總計畫,致力於推動全國二氧化碳排放減量,希望於2020年回到2005年排放量,於2025年回到2000年排放量。本文希望可透過研究歐盟與德國之淨源減碳法規架構,並回顧與檢討我國目前相關法制建構之情況,以提供我國未來法制革新之借鏡。
In order to combat climate change, each country is very keen at developing emission reduction policy and adopting related legislations. Due to the unclear international status, Taiwan is not a formal member states of either UNFCCC or Kyoto Protocol but has long been voluntarily participated in the discussion and implementation of emission reduction duties as a duty of "non-annex I" countries. For instance right after the Copenhagen Accord, Taiwan proposes its Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) and its implementation comprehensive policy framework called "Master 2010 Master Plan on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction" and establish a special Committee on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction (CECER) with a view to ambitiously reduce the GHG to the level of 2005 in 2020 and the level of 2000 in 2025. In order to understand the weakness of Taiwan's climate change policy and legal framework, this article will investigate into the European experience and hope to find out some key factor to improve Taiwan's climate change policy and legal framework.