政策試點解決爭議性道德政策之嘗試：以宜蘭縣流浪犬絕育回置政策為例

An Analysis of Solving Controversial Moral Policy by Pilot Program: Take Yilan County's ＂Trap Neuter Return＂ Policy of Stray Dog as an Example

吳宗憲(Chuang-Hsien Wu)

《政策與人力管理》 8卷2期 (2017/12) Pp. 49-90

https://doi.org/10.29944/PPM.201712_8(2).0002

摘要

國內的流浪犬絕育回置政策，因爭議型道德政策性質，使民眾投注高度的情感與價值認同，使政府難以尋求具共識的治理方案，有識者因而主張，透過政策試點的方法，以促進爭議的各方聚焦，並以試點所得到的證據來釐清事實，將爭議型道德政策去道德化。本文將說明，政策試點若能同時使用績效評估、過程評估及成果評估等多元的政策試點評估方法，應可得到較佳的評估，但從本案經驗來說，在研究資源不足、研究設計無法排除其他因素，研究資訊因過多執行細節而無法精確，以及利害相關人自行詮釋資訊的問題下，所得的資訊，仍然只能夠形成「證據影響」或「證據感知」的政策，只能促使道德爭議聚焦且去道德化，未來若欲達成「循證政策」，據之徹底解決道德爭議，還需要更精緻的政策試點研究設計。

關鍵字

循證政策 ； 爭議型道德政策 ； 絕育回置政策 ； 政策試點 ； 政策試點評估

並列摘要

In Taiwan, due to essence of moral policy, people input highly emotion and identity into the ＂Trap Neuter Return＂ policy of stray dog. Therefore, it's difficult for government to find out a governance program with consensus. For solving this, persons of deep insight propose that we can use pilot program to help parties concentrate on some conflicts, to gain the evidences to confirm the facts, and to demoralize the controversial moral policy. In our article, we point out even using performance evaluation, process evaluation and product evaluation simultaneously, due to lacking enough research resources, not excluding other factors, not getting precise data from these administrative details, and stakeholders interpret these data wantonly, these date we collect can only assist to form ＂evidence-influenced＂ or ＂evidence-aware＂ policy, but not ＂evidence-based＂ policy. Although there operations of pilot program can help us concentrate more on these moral dispute and demoralize them, but the pilot program can't solve these moral controversial completely.

並列關鍵字

Evidence-based Policy ； Controversial Moral Policy ； ＂Trap Neuter Return＂ Policy ； Pilot Program ； Evaluation of Pilot Program