重組社會物質性－產業機具的差異襲產化

Reassembling Socio-materiality: The Differential Heritization of Industrial Equipment

賴子儀(Zih-Yi Lai) ； 王志弘(Chih-Hung Wang)

《博物館學季刊》 36卷2期 (2022/04) Pp. 7-28

https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.202204_36(2).0001

摘要

本文旨在提出襲產的存有論論題，藉此深化對襲產保存的思辨。襲產化涉及物件的意義詮釋、價值賦予、展示與再現，亦即物件在襲產化脈絡下的重新客體化與重新組裝。本文以產業遺址的機具保存與展示為例，探討不同的社會物質性與不同襲產化保存策略的關聯，藉此主張對於物的特性應有更多的關注。作者首先回顧襲產保存中，做為歷史見證之實存物、做為敘事指認之象徵物，以及做為社會行動之操演物等不同定位。作者進一步提出客體化、物的關係存有論，以及社會物質性重組等觀點，來拓展物件在襲產化中的可能樣貌。為了令論證更具體，作者基於參與觀察和二手資料，通過十鼓仁德糖廠、中油高雄煉油廠、建國啤酒廠等案例，說明不同機具的物質特性、襲產化樣態及其侷限與可能。作者另以洲南鹽場為參照，說明較少機具的非工業類產業襲產，也能通過物的重新定位和組裝，將襲產安置於更廣泛的社會關係、文化實作，以及地方創造的動態中，而擺脫標本化的思維。

關鍵字

產業襲產 ； 客體化 ； 關係存有論 ； 物質文化

並列摘要

The purpose of this paper is to put forward ontological propositions of heritage to deepen the discussion on heritage conservation. Heritization involves the interpretation, value assignment, display, and representation of objects, meaning their re-objectification and reassembly. In this article, examples of the preservation and display of equipment in industrial ruins are utilized to explore the relationships between social-materiality and preservation strategies. The results reveal that more attention should be paid to the characteristics of objects. The authors first review the positioning of physical objects as historical witnesses, symbolic objects for narrative identification, and performative objects for social action in heritage conservation. They next put forward the viewpoints of objectification, the relational ontology of objects, and the reassembly of social-materiality, to expand the possible forms of objects in heritization. Subsequently, they explain the material properties, heritization types, limitations, and possibilities for equipment using specific examples of the Ten Drum Creative Park at Rende Sugar Factory, CPC Corporation Kaohsiung Refinery, and Jianguo Brewery based on participant observation and second-hand data. The Zhounan Salt Field serves as a reference for non-industrial industries with less equipment, which can also be repositioned and reassembled to place heritage within the broader dynamics of social relationship, cultural performance, and place-making, while avoiding specimen thinking.

並列關鍵字

industrial heritage ； objectification ； relational ontology ； material culture

參考文獻

Fenollosa, L. T. and Johnston, H., 2015. Protest artifacts in the Mexican social movement sector: Reflections on the “stepchild” of cultural analysis. In: Almeida, P. and Cordero Ulate, A. (Eds.), 2015, Handbook of Social Movements across Latin America. pp. 61-76. Dordrecht: Springer.

Heitman, C. C., 2017. The creation of gender bias in museum collections: Recontextualizing archaeological and Archival collections from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. Museum Anthropology, 40(2): 128-142.

Humphries, C. and Smith, A. C. T., 2014. Talking objects: Towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization, 21(4): 477-494.

Latham, K. F., 2012. Museum object as document: Using Buckland’s information concepts to understand museum experiences. Journal of Documentation, 68(1): 45-71.

Law, J., 2002. Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(5/6): 91-105.