建構感知親生命性設計於環境體驗之概念架構

Building Conceptual Framework of Perceived Biophilic Design on Environmental Experiences

洪詩涵(Shih-Han Hung) ； 張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang)

《造園景觀學報》 24卷4期 (2020/12) Pp. 41-71

摘要

親生命假說（Biophilia Hypothesis）是指人類具有親近自然及生命體的本能，而親生命性設計強調將自然融入建成環境，進而促進生心理健康之效益。上述的論述呼應環境心理學及東方傳統環境氣等探討環境屬性、特徵與人互動關係之概念。目前親生命性設計僅著重於概念上，尚未發展評估項目，故本研究從親生命性設計理論，試圖精準地理解概念與含義後，採用專家小組、景觀專業者及非專業者語意及用字校正，將Kellert、Heerwagen與Mador（2008）提出72項環境特徵與元素萃取57項，建構59題評估建成環境中感知親生命性設計的項目。這項研究的貢獻為提出感知親生命性設計項目，測量人感受到之環境屬性、特徵與元素及其體驗，藉由感知體驗對環境評估的方式，能應用在實質景觀與環境規劃及設計方面。

關鍵字

感知親生命性設計項目 ； 環境屬性 ； 環境特徵 ； 體驗與效益 ； 建成環境

並列摘要

The Biophilia Hypothesis proposes that people have the instinct to be with nature and living bodies. Using the biophilic design can integrate nature into the built environment, thereby promoting health benefits such as physical and psychological health benefits, which is in line with related environmental psychology theories and Traditional Environmental Qi. However, there have not yet been developed evaluation items that can measure perceived biophilic design. The research builds on biophilic design theory to accurately understanding the concept and meanings and cooperates with expert group discussions, landscape professionals, and non-professionals to adjust semantics and the use of words in questionnaires. The research extracts 57 environmental features and elements from 72 items, which produced by Kellert, Heerwagen, & Mador (2008) and develops 59 questions to evaluate the items of perceived biophilic design in the built environment. This research contributes to providing a Perceived Biophilic Design Items to measure a sense of experience in nature. Through the overall perception evaluation method, it can be applied to the planning and design in the landscape.

並列關鍵字

Perceived Biophilic Design Items ； Environmental Attributes ； Environmental Features ； Experiences and Benefits ； Built Environment

參考文獻

Ulrich, R. (1984). View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421.

Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 11(3), 201-230.

Ulrich, R. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In Kellert S. and Wilson E. O. (eds.), The biophilia hypothesis, (pp. 73-137). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Van den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173-181.

Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes–Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199-212.