透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.25.161
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

以生態系服務概念發展都市公園景觀服務檢核工具

Developing the Checklist to Assess the Landscape Service in City Park within the Concept of Ecosystem Service

摘要


本研究以生態系服務概念為基礎,參考SITES、千禧生態評估、生態棲地因子與建築指標等相關評估方法,同時彙整近十五年的評估指標文獻,初步建構都市公園景觀服務檢核方法,本研究分別選取台中市舊社、北屯、健康公園三處超過二十年的都市公園作為指標檢核的操作示範,藉此了解三個公園的景觀服務機能,並檢討各項指標是否適用於都市中的公園。分析結果顯示,舊社公園具有優良的調節與支持服務、北屯公園具有較佳之支持服務,而健康公園具有優良的文化服務,但三個公園因興建時代較早,皆缺乏生產農園設施、節能設施與儲水機能、還有環境教育概念相關的活動。而在指標的檢討方面,本研究認為。在調節服務方面,因綠建築、綠能、水資源調節與廢棄物再利用指標都屬於近二十年內才公部門列入公園評估的的議題,因此適合作為相關單位對於新建闢公園的規劃設計規範。在支持服務上,綠地連接度的分析方法過去較無明確的標準,因此較難評估。建議未來應可考慮景觀生態學的概念,透過更多實證研究逐步修正指標。而在文化服務方面,環境教育的功能較為缺乏。若要加強文化服務功能,建議可將環境教育跟社區公共事務的培力工作進行結合。

並列摘要


This study aims to develop a checklist to the landscape services of urban park. The parameters of checklist was collected by reviewing the relative studies such as ecosystem service, SITES, millennium ecosystem assessment, biotope area factor, and green building assessment system. This study choose three parks (Jiou-She park, Bei-Tuen park, Jian-Kang parks) which had been constructed for more than 20 years in Taichung city as the sites for landscape service assessment. The result shows that Jiou-She park was the best park of regulating service and good supporting service, Bei-Tuen park had the best of supporting service, and Jian-Kang park had the best cultural service. However, there was shortage of energy conservation facilities, wetlands and environmental educational events in the assessment of landscape service. As to the examination of the parameters of checklist, the result of this study also recommended that food security might not be necessary for the providing service of urban park. Also, several critical landscape service items such as water saving, waste treatment, and energy savin which were not suitable for old park assessment of landscape service were suggested to be integrated into the norm of the proposed project of parks in the future. Furthermore, environmental education and volunteer training should be taken into urban park management along with community empowerment work.

並列關鍵字

Urban Park Ecosystem Service Checklist

參考文獻


Chapin, F. S., 3rd, Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., …Díaz, S. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405(6783), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012241
Mayer, P. M., Reynolds, S. K., Jr, McCutchen, M. D., & Canfield, T. J. (2007). Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. Journal of environmental quality, 36(4), 1172–1180. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0462
Taylor, J. R. & Lovell, S. T. (2012). Mapping public and private spaces of urban agriculture in Chicago through the analysis of high-resolution aerial images in Google Earth. Landscape and Urban Planning, 108(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.08.001
Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L. and Taylor, L.G. (1982) Landscape Perception: Research, Application and Theory.Landscape and Urban Planning, 9, 1-33.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
中華民國景觀學會(2010)。公園綠地系統規劃設計參考手冊。引用於 2021 年 8 月 4 日,取自:http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11812&Itemid=53。

延伸閱讀