並列摘要
Nietzsche's exotic and esoteric teachings are no longer obscurant. But in order to avoid further confusions, a straight-forward clarification is called for here: ＂God is dead＂ according to Nietzsche himself is his plain, exotic and sensational catchword while ＂modern intellectuals have degraded to a herd of livestock＂, his esoteric teaching. Like Jorge, the blind priest in Umberto Eco's novel The Name of the Rose, Nietzsche has smeared all his writings with poison, laying down a plot to kill ruthlessly all those post-Enlightenment illuminati and literati who take a delight in reading his books. Nietzsche handles esotericism with a master-hand, pushing the ＂logic＂ of the enlightened reason to an extreme (hence: reason =will =elan vital), exaggerating radically the anti-Christian mentality of the Enlightenment and pretending to be the most enlightened person (The case of Lu Xun is an illustration of someone being fooled by Nietzsche's make-believe). Since the death of Nietzsche one hundred years ago, countless illuminati and literati have taken this make-believe of Nietzsche as an inherited revelation by which they may create new values and enlighten the indifferent masses. Even today those preachers of post-modernity walk away satisfied and cherishing Nietzsche's plain, exotic and sensational catchword. They are convinced what they have kept a hold on is the esoteric teaching of Nietzsche. They never realise that their hands now are full of the poison permeating in Nietzsche's books.
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- 保羅．迪李歐、游明哲（2014）。文本生成及哲學性分析探討尼采的一個標題。中山人文學報，(37)，17-32。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10243131-201407-201409020002-201409020002-17-32
- 羅峰（2018）。書評：勞倫斯‧朗佩特，《尼采的教誨》。哲學與文化，45(2)，133-138。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-201802-201803020014-201803020014-133-138
- 李克寰（2003）。尼采思想之『力量』視角。師大學報：人文與社會科學類，48(2)，119-133。https://doi.org/10.6210/JNTNULL.2003.48(2).03
- （1971）。書刊評介：尼采─其人及其思想（工藤綏夫著）。現代學苑，8(10)，42-43。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRAS.197110.0042
- 黃麗綺（2012）。From "Nihilism" to "Laughing"-On Nietzsche's Doctrine of Eternal Recurrence。國立臺灣大學哲學論評，(43)，41-80。https://doi.org/10.6276/NTUPR.2012.03.(43).02