護教學中的認識論

在後現代性之中，護教學的兩大領域即進攻性護教學和防禦性護教學，對神學的維護和辯護作用是至關重要的。然而，護教學中的兩大方法即預設派和證據派，在傳統上卻往往被認為是相互對立的，在理性主義產生之後，護教學自身更顯示出許多局限。不過，有一種觀點可以為預設派和證據派護教學提供一致性基礎，即上帝滲透在所有知識之中。由此基礎生發出的每一種方法都是互補的，而且這種互補性可以延伸並形成辯護的統一理論，護教學中的預設派和證據派方法當然亦是如此。本文通過論述護教學兩大方法與認識論的關係，來證明護教學的科學性、邏輯性和理論性，同時呈現科學在護教學認識論中所發揮的重要作用。

關鍵字

認識論；護教學；預設派；證據派

並列摘要

In highlighting the post-modernity of relative meta-narrative and its paradigm shift, the two major areas of apologetics, namely offensive apologetics and defensive apologetics, are crucial to the maintenance and defense of theology. However, the two main methods of apologetics, namely presupposition and evidence, are traditionally considered to be contradictory to each other, especially after the emergence of rationalism, so apologetics itself shows many limitations. One idea, however, that can provide a consistent basis for presuppositional and evidential apologetics is that God permeates all knowledge. Each method derived from this foundation is also complementary, and this complementarity can be extended to form a unified theory of justification. The principle of unified epistemology in apologetics lies in the universality and normative role of the content of God's revelation. Under the guidance of this principle, the presuppositional and evidential methods of apologetics depend on each other, and create a theoretical basis for the unity of knowledge in Christianity. This article discusses the relationship between the two methods of apologetics and epistemology to prove the scientific, logical and theoretical nature of apologetics. This article also discusses the important role of science in the epistemology of apologetics, that is, the modern scientific method is regarded as the only model of rationality, and science can systematically describe the universal experience of nature to make up for the lack of theology appealing to God's absolute normativity.

並列關鍵字

Epistemology ； Apologetics ； Presuppositionalism ； Evidentialism

國際替代計量

護教學中的認識論

全文下載

主題瀏覽