透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.88.130
  • 期刊

群育的哲學分析

A Philosophical Analysis of Sociability Education

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

並列摘要


Men are both unsocial and social; education therefore should develop individuality and sociability. A sound development of individuality is not necessarily incompatible with a reasonable sociability education. Since our world is still a mad world, the enterprise of sociability education intranationally or internationally so far has been proved to be a failure. This paper critically scrutinizes the concepts, the criteria, the problems and strategies of sociability and sociability education. Foggy as the concept of sociableness or sociability education is, it is, even as an educational slogan, too important to neglect in this new era of warring states, politically or economically. As to the criteria for such an education, the reasonable playfulness and favourable seriousness are, inter alia, propounded. Moreover, some positive and negative strategies are recommended to cure our problems in culture and education, such as, more peace and less unjust wars, more reasonable cooperation and less vicious competition...etc.

並列關鍵字

無資料

被引用紀錄


李瑞英(2013)。~放學花路米~一位國民小學二年級校內課後照顧服務班教師方案設計之行動研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.01216
周庚瑜(2012)。惠欽格(J. Huizinga)的「遊戲人」(Homo Ludens)人類圖像及其在教育上的蘊義〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315305087

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量