透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.42.249
  • 期刊

資優班生的系統性壓力:落後者觀點

Systematic Pressures of Students in the Gifted Class: From the Underachievers' Perspectives

摘要


許多學生希望能擠進資優班窄門,卻對資優班裡的世界一無所悉。資優教育旨在協助資賦優異學生適性發展潛能,卻未曾真正思考資優班教育是否真的適合每位資優班生。而資優班落後者同時背負資優生與落後者兩個衝突的二元標籤,其所面臨的雙重壓力更是鮮少被認真探討,因此,本研究從生物生態系統角度,以質性研究範式深度訪談四位曾就讀高中數理資優班且經歷學習落後的學生,以整體內容分析從社會文化(大系統)、學校制度、班級教學、家庭(中系統及小系統)等層面探討他們所背負的壓力,並從時間系統的角度檢視多年前資優班經驗對其往後生涯發展的意義。研究結果發現,學校、教師、家庭常將資優班生視為同質,忽視其個人需求,也加劇資優與落後雙重標籤所帶來的壓力。本研究希望藉此促發更多強調學生殊異性與個別需求的對話,從而面對並解決資優教育在理念與實務間的落差。

並列摘要


Many students are fascinated with the idea of attending gifted classes but know little about their true nature and high demands. While the purpose of gifted education is to facilitate students with talents in actualizing their potential, people rarely consider whether gifted classes are suitable for every qualified student. In fact, the underachievers in gifted classes bear the conflicting dual labels of "gifted students" and "underachievers," and these dual pressures are rarely understood. Based on the qualitative research paradigm, we conducted in-depth interviews with four students who attended a high school math-science academic gifted class years ago and suffered from falling behind and maladjustment. We used the bioecological model and the holistic-content method to analyze the pressures they experienced from the environmental systems, including social culture (Macrosystem), school regulations, class teaching, and family (Mesosystem and Microsystem). We explored the meanings of these experiences in their life-development from the Chronosystem perspective. We found that schools, teachers, and families tended to treat students in the gifted class as homogeneous, which not only overlooked students' individual needs but also aggravated the pressures from dual labeling. We hope this study will draw attention to the heterogeneity and diverse needs among students in gifted classes and bridge the gap between the ideals and practices in gifted education.

參考文獻


王震武(2002)。升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎:一個歷史觀察。本土心理學研究,17,3-65。https://doi.org/10.6254/2002.17.3 [Wang, J.-W. (2002). The reason and myth of education fanaticism: A historical review. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17(1), 3-65. https://doi.org/10.6254/2002.17.3]
宋曜廷、黃瓅瑩、郭念平、曾芬蘭(2012)。以縱貫學業表現檢驗大魚小池效應與見賢思齊效應。中華心理學刊,54(3),315-330。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2012.5403.03 [Sung, Y.-T., Huang, L.-Y., Kuo, N.-P., & Tseng, F.-L. (2012). Examining the big-fish-little-pond and upward comparison effects using longitudinal learning achievement. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2012.5403.03]
林佩芳、張靖卿(2012)。從網路新聞看媒體對資優教育的認知。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,44,57-86。https://doi.org/10.6379/AJSE.201212.0057 [Lin, P.-F., & Zhang, J.-Q. (2012). Media perceptions of gifted education from online news. Annual Journal of Special Education, 44, 57-86. https://doi.org/10.6379/AJSE.201212.0057]
郭靜姿(2013)。如何實施資優學生的區分性教學?資優教育季刊,127,1-11。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2013.127.01-11 [Kuo, C.-C. (2013). Implementing differentiated instruction for gifted and talented students. Gifted Education, 127, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2013.127.01-11]
郭靜姿、李欣潔、陳彥瑋、范成芳、王曼娜、劉貞宜、游健弘(2009)。資優學生鑑定標準及安置方式之調查研究。資優教育研究,9(2),1-33。https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200912.0001 [Kuo, C.-C., Li, H.-C., Chen, Y.-W., Fan, C.-F., Wang, M.-N., Liu, C.-Y., & Yu, C.-H. (2009). A survey research on identification criteria and placement of gifted and talented students. Journal of Gifted Education, 9(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200912.0001]

延伸閱讀