透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.219.22.169
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

機器人課程教材鷹架對高中生未來關鍵學習能力的影響

The Impacts of Material Scaffoldings on Students' Learning Competencies in High School Robotics Curriculum

摘要


近年來,機器人在教育上的應用被認為是具有提升學生五大關鍵學習能力(批判思考能力、問題解決能力、溝通討論能力、協同合作能力及創造創新能力)的有效課程之一,但文獻上關於機器人學習課程對學生這五項關鍵學習能力的影響仍不十分清楚。本研究透過機器人課程中不同程度的鷹架教材,探究其對高中生關鍵學習能力的影響。研究樣本為臺北市某普通高中選修機器人課程的兩個班級,共63位學生,實驗課程總計15週,其中一個班級提供高程度鷹架的輔助教具,另一個班級則提供低程度鷹架的輔助教具,其他所有課程與教學活動均相同。本研究以關鍵學習能力量表進行實驗前、後測,並於課程結束後,選取部分學生進行焦點訪談。研究結果發現,兩組學生在批判思考能力和問題解決能力兩面向上並無顯著差異;然而,在協同合作能力、創造創新能力,以及溝通討論能力三個面向上則發現低程度鷹架教材反而具有較正面的影響,焦點訪談資料分析亦佐證此一發現。此研究結果可對未來機器人課程與教材設計提供相關建議。

並列摘要


In recent years, robotics education has been regarded as a potential approach to enhance students' five learning competencies (i.e., critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, communication, as well as creative thinking). However, empirical studies regarding the impacts of robotic curricula on learners' learning competencies are still very limited. In this study, we used two different scaffolding materials to explore the impact of the robotics teaching materials on students' learning competencies. The sample of this study was 63 high school students who enrolled in a 15-weeks robotics course, intact in two classes, in a public high school of Taipei. The two scaffolding materials were randomly assigned to the two classes. A questionnaire was used to assess students’ five learning competencies before and after the robotics curriculum. ANCOVAs were used to compare the five competencies between the two groups. The results showed that no significant difference was found in critical thinking and problem solving competencies between the two groups. However, the low scaffolding group showed significantly higher competencies in collaboration, communication and creative thinking. The result was confirmed by a follow-up focused interview. The results of this study can provide some suggestions for future teaching material designs for the robotics education.

參考文獻


張鈿富(2009)。歐美澳公民關鍵能力發展之研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立教育資料館=National Education Information Center。
黃子瓔(2010,11月)。從3R到4C:淺談21世紀能力的發展與趨勢。數位典藏與學習電子報,9(11)。取自 http://newsletter.teldap.tw/news/NewsContent.php?nid=4112&lid=466【Huang, Z.-Y. (2010, November). From 3R to 4C: On the development and tendency of the 21st century 's ability. e-Learning and Digital Archives eNews, 9(11). Retrieved from http://newsletter.teldap.tw/news/NewsContent.php?nid=4112&lid=466】
曾建銘(2015)。21世紀評量的發展趨勢。教育脈動。1,156-164。
Ananiadou, K.,Claro, M.(2009).21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries.,未出版.
Bellanca, J.(Ed.),Brandt, R.(Ed.)(2010).21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn.Bloomington, IN:Solution Tree Press.

被引用紀錄


聶從煊(2018)。機電工程教育之問題導向專題學習模式設計 ─以無人自行車為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800270
楊秀全、李隆盛(2023)。範例引導與問題導向混合學習策略對國小學生機器人程式學習成效的影響科學教育學刊31(4),391-413。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202312_31(4).0004
黃元彥、劉旨峰、林俊閎(2021)。108課綱科技領域素養導向課程之設計思考鷹架與學習情境安排:以樂高EV3機器人學習活動為例教育傳播與科技研究(126),21-38。https://doi.org/10.6137/RECT.202108_(126).0002
李隆盛、楊秀全(2019)。範例引導學習與問題導向學習之教學策略對國小學生機器人程式學習的影響數位學習科技期刊11(4),77-104。https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2019101104004
胡淑華、蔡孟蓉(2019)。國中機器人STEAM跨領域課程發展研究:以彰化縣二水國中培龍計畫為例數位學習科技期刊11(4),51-75。https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2019101104003

延伸閱讀