透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.141.6
  • 期刊

《群書治要》與貞觀之治——從君臣互動談起

Qun Shu Zhi Yao and Prosperity of Zhenguan: On the Interaction between Rulers and Subjects

摘要


學界研究《群書治要》多受類書印象的侷限,聚焦於文獻學層面,極少從思想的角度進行探究。因此,筆者嘗試透過《貞觀政要》的連結與對比,彰顯具有「以編代作」性質的《群書治要》思想內涵。基於思想內涵涉及層面廣闊,本文鎖定「為君難」、「為臣不易」、「君臣共生」與「直言受諫」四個主題式焦點議題,探討貞觀時期在君臣互動上的思想底蘊。文章的結構分四大部分來敘述,期盼藉此脈絡的探究,彰顯《群書治要》的學術價值,同時釐清貞觀時期所存在的實踐課題。首先,扼要說明《群書治要》的編纂與思想架構,意在展示主題式議題的情形。再者,藉由與《貞觀政要》相關聯的梳理,分析《群書治要》編輯所內含的文本詮釋與體系化思維。三者,釐清君臣互動各議題的論辯,呈現其彼此關聯的體系,同時考察其思想的變化。最後,以重構「君臣之義」的觀點,綜合論述「貞觀之治」典範的偏取形塑、君臣的相遇共理以及《群書治要》的資鑑取用,揭示《群書治要》蘊含的價值與意義。

並列摘要


Qun Shu Zhi Yao research has limited by the impression of category books and focus on philology issues, yet rarely discussed from the perceptive of ideology. This essay attempts to show the ideological connotation of Qun Shu Zhi Yao with the nature of "Edit instead of creation" through the connection and comparison of Zhenguan's political Schemas. This essay focus on four topics: "Difficult to be a rulers", "Not easy to be the subject either", "Symbiotic of the rulers and subjects" and "Accept direct advice", through such a discussion, highlight the academic value of Qun Shu Zhi Yao, also clarify the changes in thinking that existed during Zhenguan period. First of all, it briefly explains the compilation and ideological framework of Qun Shu Zhi Yao, which aims to show the situation of thematic issues. Secondly, by combing the relationship with Zhenguan's political Schemas, this essay analyzes the text interpretation and systematic thinking contained in Qun Shu Zhi Yao. Thirdly, clarify the debates on the subjects of the interaction between rulers and subjects, present their interrelated systems, and examine the changes in their thoughts. Finally, to reconstruct the interpretation of the "Meaning of ruler and subject", revealing the value and significance of the Qun Shu Zhi Yao.

參考文獻


*牟宗三:《歷史哲學》,收入《牟宗三先生全集》第 9 冊,臺北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司,2003。Mou Zong San, Li Shi Zhe Xue [The Philosophy of History] Adopted in Mou Zong San Xian Sheng Quan Ji [The Complete Works of Mou Zong San] Vol. 9 (Taipei: Linking Publishing Company, 2003).
吳金華:〈略談日本古寫本《群書治要》的文獻學價值〉,《文獻》3(2003.7),頁118-127。
*杜正勝:《古代社會與國家》,臺北:允晨文化實業股份有限公司,1992。Tu Zheng Sheng, Gu Dai She Hui Yu Guo Jia [Ancient Society and State] (Taipei: Asian Culture Company, 1992).
*林朝成、張瑞麟:《「教學研究計畫─以《群書治要》為對象》,臺南:成功大學中文系,2018。Lin Chao Cheng & Chang Jui Lin, Jiao Xue Yan Jiu Ji Hua: Yi Qun Shu Zhi Yao Wei Dui Xiang [Teaching Research Plan: Qun Shu Zhi Yao as the Object] (Tainan: National Cheng Kung University Chinese Department, 2018).
*林朝成:〈《群書治要》與貞觀之治─從君臣互動談起〉,《成大中文學報》67(2019.12),頁 101-142。Lin Chao Chen, “Qun Shu Zhi Yao and Prosperity of Zhenguan: On the Interaction between Rulers and Subjects” in Journal of Chinese Literature of National Cheng Kung University 67 (Dec. 2019), pp. 101-142

延伸閱讀