透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.67.177
  • 期刊

政府補貼、資本密集度與糧油加工業產能過剩-以糧油加工上市公司為例

Government Subsidies, Capital Intensity and Overcapacity of Grain and Oil Processing Industry - A Case Study of Listed enterprises of Grain and Oil Processing Industry

摘要


補貼下游加工業是為加快糧食“去庫存”及促進糧食產業健康發展,但糧油加工業的產能過剩會使補貼政策處境尷尬,易逆向加劇行業產能過剩、阻礙糧食產業持續發展。本文將糧油加工上市企業分為初、深加工兩種類型,採用生產函數法對糧油加工業整體及其細分類別產能利用情況進行估算分析,並實證研究了行業產能過剩的可能性成因。結果表明:糧油初、深加工企業均有不同程度的產能過剩,具有較高資本貢獻率的初加工企業同時產能過剩程度較強。深加工企業產能利用水準雖較高,但產品並無明顯競爭力,產能依然持續過剩。對糧油加工業而言,政府補貼會正向促進其產能過剩形成,且深加工領域更為明顯。具有較高資本密集度的企業更易出現投資過剩,較低的投資效率會使產能閒置,同時補貼下企業資本密集度的提高會加劇行業產能過剩。

並列摘要


The purpose of subsidizing the downstream processing industry is to speed up the destocking of the grain and promote the healthy development of grain industry. But the overcapacity of the grain and oil processing industry will make the subsidy policy in an awkward position. In this paper, listed grain and oil processing enterprises are divided into two types: primary and deep processing, and the production function method is used to estimate and analyze the overall utilization of grain and oil processing industry and its sub-categories. The results show that the grain and oil primary and deep processing enterprises have different degrees of excess capacity. The primary processing enterprises with higher capital contributions also have a higher degree of overcapacity. Although the capacity utilization level of deep processing enterprises is relatively high, it's products are not obviously competitive and capacity continues to be excessive. For the grain and oil processing industry, government subsidies will positively promote the formation of its excess capacity. This phenomenon is more obvious in the field of deep processing. Enterprises with higher capital intensity are more prone to over-investment and result in overcapacity easily. Besides, the increased capital intensity of subsidized enterprises will exacerbate industrial overcapacity.

參考文獻


Du, W., Wang, F., & Li, M. 2020. Effects of environmental regulation on capacity utilization: Evidence from energy enterprises in China. Ecological Indicators, 113. in press. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106217
王佳杰、童錦治與李星,2014。稅收競爭、財政支出壓力與地方非稅收入增長。財貿經濟,第五期:27-38。(Wang, J. J, Tong, J. Z., & Li, X. 2014. Tax competition, fiscal pressure and the non-tax revenue expansion of local governments. Finance & Trade Economics, (5):27-38.)
王曉姝與李鋰,2012。產能過剩的誘因與機制——基於政府視角的模型化分析。財經問題研究,第九期:40-47。(Wang, X. S., & Li, L. 2012. Causes of excess production capacity and regulation: A modeling analysis based on government perspective. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 9: 40-47.)
王立國與鞠雷,2012。地方政府干預、企業過度投資與產能過剩:26 個行業樣本。改革,第十二期:52-62 。 (Wang, L. G., & Ju, L. 2012. Local government intervention, enterprise over investment and over capacity: 26 industry sample. Reform, 12: 52-62.)
王洋與余志剛,2016。供給側改革背景下糧食加工產業鏈整合與優化——基於糧食主產區四省七縣的實地調查。學習與探索,第三期:93-96。(Wang, Y., & Yu, Z. G. 2016. The integration and optimization of grain processing industry chain under the background of supply-side reform -- based on the field survey of four provinces and seven counties in major grain-producing areas. Study & Exploration, 3: 93-96.)

延伸閱讀