並列摘要
Because of its assertion of the evilness of human-nature, Hsun Tzu has aroused various misunderstanding. Scholars generally like to divide the mind and the nature of man that Hsun Tzu said into two: categories (1) human-nature is confined to animal instincts and (2) mind is confined to the mind of cognition, and so the learning of Hsun Tzu cannot solve the problem ＂If human-nature is evil, how can li (rite) and yi (righteousness) be derived?＂ Therefore scholars merely consider the li and yi that Hsun Tzu said as external authority or objective actuality, lacking in the basis of internal nature and mind, and hence cannot adequately expound human-nature. This article presents a discussion on this point of view. The author points out that the nature that Hsun Tzu said is neither confined to animal instincts, nor the mind of cognition. The sage ordained li and yi and therefore moral standard is derived and based on human-nature.
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- 李瑞全（2012）。荀子哲學之價值規範根源問題：兼論孟荀之孔門承傳之取向。中央大學人文學報，(50)，23-49。https://doi.org/10.29905/JCUT.201204.0002
- 陳哲儒（2016）。當代荀子哲學詮釋的省察與再探索〔博士論文，淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0002-1207201608571900
- 柳熙星（1997）。試論荀子「禮」的價值根源問題。鵝湖月刊，(261)，9-19。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.199703.0003
- 魏代富（2015）。The Supplement of Hsun-tzu。鵝湖學誌，(55)，73-167。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10213732-201512-201602150016-201602150016-73-167
- 李哲賢（1994）。The Study of the Characteristics of Hsun Tzu's Theory of Propriety (Li)。哲學與文化，21(12)，1101-1110。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.199412.1101