廢婚家，去強權－1900-1910年代中國無政府主義婚家革命論的連續體批判

本文初步選擇三個例子為研究個案，討論1900－1910年代中國無政府主義婚家革命論的知識型構──連續體批判──廢除強權的起點即是婚家革命。一、1907年何震發表於《天義》的〈經濟革命與女子革命〉、〈論女子當知共產主義〉二文，她的論述重點不在追求男女平權，而是進行經濟革命，顛覆財婚以達成共產主義。二、1908年胡漢民發表於《新世紀》的〈粵中女子之不嫁者〉，此文介紹廣東女子的不嫁文化，落實在地的革命實踐，既從傳統出發，又自現代回望。三、1912－1914年師復〈廢家族主義〉、〈廢婚姻主義〉及發表於《晦鳴錄》與《民聲》的相關文章，他不僅置疑婚家國連續體，亦指出廢婚家是去強權之首要，更進一步以自由戀愛為對抗手段。從廢婚家到去強權，此論不以推翻婚家為唯一目標，而是綜合批判由政府、經濟、文化、迷信等所構成環環相扣的連續體，其意義在於廢除壓迫性強權，解放個人直面社會，同時亦提供思考親密關係的「另一種可能」。

關鍵字

婚家革命；中國無政府主義；連續體批判；共產；自由戀愛

並列摘要

This paper uses three examples to discuss the intellectual structure related to Anarchism's marriage and family revolution in China during the 1900s and 1910s. A continuum of criticism was the starting the point for breaking oppressive power structures of abolishing marriage and family. 1. In 1907, He Zhen published the two articles, ＂Economic Revolution and Women's Revolution＂ and ＂Women Should Know Communism,＂ in Tian Yi (Natural Justice). However, she did not focus on the equality of men and women, and instead focused on economic revolution. 2. In 1908, Hu Hanmin published ＂Unmarried Women in Guangdong＂ in New Century, introducing the culture of unmarried women in Guangdong, which originated in traditional mores and traced forward into modern times. 3. Between 1912 and 1914, Shifu published ＂Abolition of Family Doctrine,＂＂Abolition of Marriage Doctrine,＂ and related articles in Hui Ming Lu and Minsheng. He not only questioned the continuum of marriage and family, but also pointed out that abolishing marriage and family was the first step to breaking oppressive power structures. Furthermore, he used free love as a means of confrontation. By proposing abolishing marriage and family in order to break oppressive power structures, these writers intended not only to overthrow marriage and family, but also to criticize the interlocking continuum formed by the government, economy, culture, marriage, family, etc. The significance of this approach lay in breaking oppressive power structures, liberating the individual, and giving individuals the ability to face society. At the same time, their writings provided ＂another possibility＂ for understanding intimacy.

並列關鍵字

Marriage and Family Revolution ； Anarchism in China ； Continuum Criticism ； Communism ； Free Love

參考文獻

王遠義：〈無政府主義概念史的分析〉，《臺大歷史學報》第 33 期，2004 年 6月，頁 399-425。DOI:10.6253/ntuhistory.2004.33.11

洪喜美：〈五四前後廢除家族制與廢姓的討論〉，《國史館學術集刊》第 3 期，2003 年 9 月，頁 1-30。DOI:10.7058/BAH.200309.0001

陳慧文：〈二十世紀中國毀家廢婚論的思想初探〉，《立德學報》第 5 卷第 1 期，2007 年 12 月，頁 114-128。DOI: 10.6843/NTHU.2015.00005

楊芳燕：〈激進主義、現代情境與中國無政府主義之崛起〉，《臺大歷史學報》第 33 期，2004 年 6 月，頁 365-397。DOI:10.6253/ntuhistory.2004.33.10

〔日〕安井伸介：〈婚姻家庭，自由之蟊賊也：中國無政府主義家庭革命論的意含〉，《政治科學論叢》第 74 期，2017 年 12 月，頁 77-110。DOI:10.6166/TJPS.74(77-110)

主題瀏覽