邏輯視域下漢藏因明推理模式比較研究

The Comparison Study between the Chinese Derived Hetuvidya and the Tibetan Logics in Logic Field

朱敏(Zhu Min)

《禪與人類文明研究》 2期 (2017/12) Pp. 119-132

摘要

漢藏因明的推理模式從本質上來說有著極大的不同。漢傳因明主要繼承了陳那的三支論式，而藏傳因明則是在法稱的論式結構的基礎上進行的再發展。本文從邏輯視域出發，通過對漢傳因明和藏傳因明在推理模式方面的考察，比較分析了二者的論證形式。此外，通過分析學者們對漢傳因明和藏傳因明推理模式所進行的考察，嘗試探討其邏輯刻劃的可能性。

關鍵字

漢傳因明 ； 藏傳因明 ； 邏輯 ； 推理 ； 論式

並列摘要

Essentially, there are great differences between the reasoning mode of Chinese Derived Hetuvidya and Tibetan Logics. While the Chinese Derived Hetuvidya mainly inherits the three branches of Dignaga's Hetuvidya reasoning, Tibetan Logics is the redevelopment on the basis of the Dhamakirti’s Hetuvidya reasoning. From the viewpoint of logic, this article compares the reasoning mode of the Chinese Derived Hetuvidya and the Tibetan Logics and tries to discuss the possibility of their logical description.

並列關鍵字

the Chinese Derived Hetuvidya ； the Tibetan Logics ； logic ； reasoning ； Mode