摘要
一、中共的海權思想與中國傳統海權思想、高希柯夫及馬漢的海權思想皆有關聯，而此三者分別對中共領導人造成不同層次的影響。二、海權思想並非是一成不變，隨著海權知識的增加、內外環境的變遷，海權思想也會跟隨著改變，也因此就會有不同的海軍戰略的產出。三、中共建政迄今的內外在環境變遷，在1980年以前，中共的海權思想較為薄弱，當時所面臨的衝突又以陸地居多，加上陸權強國蘇俄對其不斷壓迫，中共自然會以陸權為重，對海洋利益的維護也未加以重視。四、1980年以後，中共所需面對的海洋事務逐日增多，除了部分原因與各國對海洋權益的重視程度高於以往有關，更大的原因是受改革開放及高度重視其主權利益所影響。而這正檢證了內外環境的改變，會對中共海權思想造成影響。
並列摘要
1. The thinking of PLA sea power is interrelated with Chinese tradition, Admiral Gorshkov, and Mahan. The three also has made somewhat influence to Chinese leaders. 2. The thinking of sea power does not stay unchanged. It constantly changes with the maritime knowledge and environment and then generates different naval strategy. 3. Before 1980, the thinking of Chinese sea power was informatory while the conflicts that China encountered back then was ground basis plus the press coming from land power Russia. All of those led China to focusing on land power instead of sea power. 4. After 1980, China has been facing the increasing maritime affairs that partially because of other nations; emphasis on sea rights. More importantly is to attribute to the Reform and Opening Up and sovereignty. This all prove that the change of inner and outer environment would affect the thinking of sea power.
延伸閱讀
- 強納森．華德、程永光（2020）。海權思想對中共的影響。海軍學術雙月刊，54(3)，55-64。https://doi.org/10.6237/NPJ.202006_54(3).0004
- 梁華傑（2011）。析論中共戰爭指導思想之改變。國防雜誌，26(5)，62-80。https://doi.org/10.6326/NDJ.2011.26(5).5
- 謝游麟（2017）。中共海軍戰略轉型之意涵與影響。海軍學術雙月刊，51(3)，33-48。https://doi.org/10.6237/NPJ.201706_51(3).0003
- 吳衛（2005）。中共『軍事戰略』思維轉變之研究。國防雜誌，20(7)，66-79。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17272432-200507-201603210019-201603210019-66-79
- 宋修國（2011）。The PLA Navy Capability In The Implementation Of Anti-Access Strategies〔碩士論文，淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0002-1907201110555900