摘要
唯物论圣经阅读作为一种科学方法论或探索原则，可以为神学创作提供一条新的进路，有助于揭露传统学术释经中普遍存在的唯心主义。在西欧，唯物论释经法主要见于三个学派：德国社会历史学派、荷兰阿姆斯特丹学派、“唯物论阅读”派，其中德国社会历史学派在女性主义释经领域影响力最大。然而，本文将重点关注“唯物论阅读”派及阿姆斯特丹学派，虽然这两个学派不那么有名，但据推测，他们定义及论述经文物质性的特殊方法可能也会对女性主义释经具有潜在的价值。文章首先介绍“唯物论阅读”派及其文本理论，并某些迄今为止尚未得出的女性主义结论，最后两部分将根据阿姆斯特丹学派的方法来探讨圣经自我诠释的女性主义内涵，并以《路加福音》为例来分析。
並列摘要
Materialist reading of the Bible, as a scientific methodology and heuristic principle, may help to expose the idealism of the prevalent academic exegesis. Materialist approaches can be found mainly in three exegetical schools in Western Europe: the Sociohistorical School in Germany, the Amsterdam School in the Netherlands and the ＂Lecture matérialiste＂, among which the Sociohistorical School has become an influential branch of feminist exegesis in Germany. However, this article will concentrate on the ＂Lecture matérialiste＂ and the Amsterdam school. Although both of them are not so well known, it is assumed that their specific way of defining and handling the materiality of biblical texts could be of potential value for feminist-critical interpretations. The article first deals with the ＂Lecture matérialiste＂ and its textual theory together with certain hitherto undrawn feminist conclusions, and then examines the feminist implications of inner-biblical self-interpretation according to the Amsterdam approach, taking Luke as an example.
延伸閱讀
- 楊婉瑩（2008）。女性主義與後物質主義的關係探究－世界價值變遷的一個側面考察。問題與研究，47(1)，1-27。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.200803_47(1).0001
- 游素玲、杜婉寧（2008）。跨國女性研究－經典研讀會。婦研縱橫，(86)，58-65。https://doi.org/10.6256/FWGS.2008.86.58
- 顔詩怡、陳怡文、林如昕、賴鈺麟、陳怡蓁（2006）。“女性主義：知識生産與實踐”學術研討會紀實。婦研縱橫，(77)，110-138。https://doi.org/10.6256/FWGS.2006.77.110
- 陸品妃（2013）。認識女性主義。思想，(23)，235-250。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000477-201305-202002150013-202002150013-235-250
- 林麗珊（2005）。Feminist Theories and Practices。哲學與文化，32(3)，3-20。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.200503.0003