- 期刊
两希之争与奥尔巴赫《摹仿论》的圣经批评
The Disputes between Athens and Jerusalem and Biblical Criticism in Auerbach's Mimesis
並列摘要
In Mimesis, Auerbach takes the well-known stories of the sacrifice of Issac in the Old Testament and Peter's threefold denial of Jesus in the New Testament and compares them respectively to the narrative of Odysseus's scar in the Odyssey, and several texts in Roman literature. Auerbach highlights the holistic demands of Biblical literature, and the truth claims of real faith, as well as the sensory representation of daily life and historical movements premised on these. The comparisons Auerbach makes in Mimesis between biblical narratives and classical literature not only provide a new perspective on the dispute between Athens and Jerusalem, but also direct the attention to the dispute between belief and philosophy between Athens and Jerusalem.
延伸閱讀
- 余莲秀、马乐梅、王雅（2015）。意识形态视域下的圣经文本批评－《士师记》17－21章与分裂的整体。聖經文學研究，()，28-59。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20181218001-201508-201906200006-201906200006-28-59
- 刘成有（2014）。现代中国的《起信》义诤与“比较经学”。比較經學，(3)，143-168。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170407001-201401-201704260017-201704260017-143-168
- Ann, H. (2011). 十七世紀的諷刺文章：閻和赫立(Jan and Gerrit)兩個荷蘭人教師的對話（下）後記：福爾摩莎落入漢人手中. 台灣學誌, (3), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.6242/twnica.3.6
- 林瑞隆（1981）。An Appraisal of the Principles for Interpreting Biblical Myths。台灣神學論刊，(3)，89-127。https://doi.org/10.29756/TJT.198103.0005
- 范明生（1994）。Greek Hellenistic Philosophy and Early Christian Theology。道風：漢語神學學刊，(1)，47-85。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20181217002-199406-201901220018-201901220018-47-85