透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.141.47.221
  • 期刊

Agricultural Subsidies, Non‐farm Employment and Rural Poverty Reduction

摘要


Based on the data of China Household Finance Survey 2015, this paper studied the poverty reduction effect of agricultural subsidies and non‐farm employment. By using the Probit regression model, the paper finds that both agricultural subsidies and non-farm employment can effectively reduce the probability of family poverty. And the higher the level of non‐farm employment, the more obvious the impact of agricultural subsidies on household poverty reduction. Therefore, in order to improve the effect of rural poverty reduction, it is necessary to guide the transference of redundant rural labor force and increase agricultural subsidies on the basis of non‐farm employment. The governments should accelerate the transference of labor force to non‐agricultural industries by increasing rural education expenditure in non‐major areas ,and increase agricultural subsidies in major grain‐producing areas to accelerate the process of agricultural modernization.

參考文獻


McCloud,N.and Kumbhakar, S.C.(2008)Do Subsidies Drive Productivity?A Cross-Country Analysis of Nordic Dairy Farms,Advances in Econometrics, 23:245-274.
Li Jungao,Li Junsong,Ren Hua(2019).The Impact of Agricultural Subsidies on Food Security and Increasing Farmers’ Incomes, Economy and Management, 33(05), 20-26.
Li Jinshan,Xu Yue(2015).The Efficiency Loss of Agricultural Subsidy Policies from the Perspective of Peasants'Income Increase,Statistical Research, 32(07), 57-63.
Lin Yifu(2002).New Thoughts in Need: A Comment on World Bank's “Reaching the Rural Poor: Strategy for Rural Development”, Journal of Peking University, (05), 5-8, 2002.
Fan Shide,Jiang Kezhong(2016).China's Labor Migration Effects on Alleviating Poverty for Rural Household:Micro Evidence Based on CFPS Data,Chinese Journal of Population Science,(05),26-34+126,2016.

延伸閱讀