The amendments of the Communication Security and Surveillance Act is made on January 14^(th), 2014. The addition of "access warrant" intends to prevent the excessive acquisition of communication records in criminal procedure. However, the change is against by prosecutors and the police and also viewed as "a legislation for revenge." Under the principle of considering the security and surveillance, this study proposes that two different natures of the surveillance of communication records and information results in different regulated intensity. Also, the amendment is not influential to justice practice. Therefore, the acquisition of communication records alike general seize and search should be primarily regulated by the Criminal Procedure Law. Meanwhile, related articles of information protection in the Personal Information Protection Act and the Telecommunication Act should be amended as soon as possible.