著作權受到財產權保障之正當性基礎論證

「著作權是一種財產權嗎？」，這個問題引發了許多有關涉及著作權和財產權基礎之理論上爭議，普通法和大陸法的學者爭辯該議題已超過三個世紀，仍然將核心停留在著作權的範圍及存續期間，因此，著作權應受到財產權之保障並非不證自明之理，本文擬先從傳統財產權之概念敘起，接著介紹著作權之正當性基礎相關理論，包括勞動理論、功利主義論、人格理論、社會規劃理論、Piggy-Backing理論、分配正義論、社會心理學論，最後進行著作權之定位研究，涵蓋著作權非財產權、著作權是一種對言論自由的規制、著作權是財產權、著作權是具公共性的準財產權等，以求對上開命題之釐清，最終自期待謀求著作權與言論自由之平衡，以達著作權法之終極目標。

關鍵字

著作權；財產權；正當性基礎；言論自由

並列摘要

Is copyright a property right? This question has raised a host of thorny theoretical issues regarding the foundational underpinnings of both copyright and property. Common law and civil law jurists have debated the issue for over three centuries. Yet remains at the heart of battles over copyright's scope and duration today. Thus, that copyright deserves the protection as property is not self-evident. This essay discusses a survey of property at first, and introduces the related theories to justify copyright, including Labor theory, Utilitarian theory, Personality theory, Social- planning theory, Piggy-backing theory, Distributing justice theory, Social psychology theory. At last, to put stress on the orientation of copyright: Copyright is not a property; Copyright is a speech regulation; Copyright is a property right; Copyright is a quasi-public property. Hope to make the said topic more clearly and strike a balance between copyright and freedom of speech.

並列關鍵字

國際替代計量

著作權受到財產權保障之正當性基礎論證

全文下載

主題瀏覽