Analysis of the Status Quo of Modern Agriculture in China

Yao Yao ； Ling Zhao

《Frontiers in Sustainable Development》 1卷4期 (2021/07) Pp. 48-52

https://doi.org/10.29500/FSD.202107_1(4).0009

摘要

Nowadays, with the rapid economic development of our country and the continuous improvement of people's living standards throughout the country, the people have higher requirements for material and cultural standards. In this case, it becomes particularly difficult to maintain the output of agricultural products and the continuous supply of special agricultural products. Enhancing the progress of modern agriculture is a major way and important work to rapidly transform the diversified forms of China's modern agriculture. Some foreign countries have found their own ways of modern agricultural development and progress, such as modern agriculture in Japan and one village, one product, the natural nature of information technology in Germany, and the construction of new rural areas in South Korea. Therefore, the people of our country should strengthen their studies and learn from the development experience of agricultural modernization in other countries, research and analyze the actual situation in our country, so as to improve and strengthen the development of modern agriculture in our country.

關鍵字

Modern agriculture ； Development model ； Current situation analysis

參考文獻

Ke Bingsheng. Understanding of Several Issues in the Development of Modern Agriculture [J]. Teaching and Research, 2007(10): 5-9.

Kong Xiangzhi, Li Shengjun. On the development model of modern agriculture in my country [J]. Teaching and Research, 2007 (10): 9-13.

Tao Wuxian.The basic characteristics and focus of modern agriculture[J]. China Rural Economy, 2004(3): 4-12.

Yu Jianzhong.Construction of Modern Agriculture and Innovation of Agricultural Organization System[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2008(4):446-448.

Wang Hongling, Bo Zhenzhong. The comparison and reference of the world agricultural science and technology service system[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2004 (12): 76-78.