透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.114.244
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

藥害救濟制度法律概念明確化之分析

Analysis on the Principle of Clarity and Definiteness of Law of Drug Injury Relief System

摘要


本研究聚焦於藥害救濟制度的規範,探討「藥害補償制度」中不予救濟理由的「常見且可預期之藥物不良反應」法律爭議事件。並限定在藥害救濟法第13條第9款規定是否違反「比例原則」及「明確性原則」之法律概念明確化的分析。本文研究方法以學術期刊及大法官解釋文作為內容,擇以「比例原則」及「明確性原則」之規範進行評比分析,期能就當前藥害救濟制度所涉之法律爭議,作整體性的探討。

並列摘要


The scope of this study mainly focuses on the specification of the drug injury relief system, which mainly involves the legal disputes of "common and predictable adverse drug reactions" in the "drug injury compensation system" for reasons of non-relief. The so-called dispute is limited to the analysis of whether the "principle of proportionality" and the "principle of clarity" stipulated in Article 13, paragraph 9 of the Drug Injury Relief Law are violated to clarify the legal concept. The author firstly discusses the norm of the drug injury relief law, and explains the actual implementation procedure of the drug injury relief law. Secondly, sorts out the controversy over the clarification of the legal concept in the above-mentioned "common and predictable adverse drug reactions". In order to focus on the core of the research, the author mainly uses academic journals and interpretations of the justices as the research materials, and chooses the " Principle of proportionality" and the "principle of clarity" to make comparative analysis.

延伸閱讀