透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.107.161
  • 學位論文

法院審判活動之「貼標籤」與「放訊號」

The Stereotyping and Signaling for the Judging Activities of the Court

指導教授 : 熊秉元

摘要


中文摘要 本論文是以資訊的角度,來詮釋法院的審判活動。先解釋資訊的意涵、功能與支持條件,然後用「貼標籤」及「放訊號」兩個概念來說明資訊的處理方法,並指出資訊的處理,涉及成本效益分析,而不同的社會成員,因其角色的差異,有不同內容的成本與效益,資訊處理手法也不相同。法院是以賽局中裁判者的角色,參與社會活動,相對於選手而言,其認識事實的成本高,而追求的效益則是信譽與權威。這會影響到資訊處理手法。 接著則分從規範與實證,兩個不同的角度,分析法院審判活動的特質,確定法院透過審判所傳遞給社會的規範訊息,是一種資產,具有經濟價值,並有客觀的標準可供衡量。而其生產方式,基於法院的賽局裁判角色特徵,發展出法律及法律體系,用以降低法院在生產過程中的處理成本,因此法律是法院生產規範訊息的輔助工具。 但法律是借助歷史經驗,採用歸納的方法而形成,其中已將實證的部分抽離,變成規則或命令。而法院的工作卻是為了處理個案,通案的法律及法律體系未必能全然顧及個案之特殊性。甚至法律工具的設計本身也會有缺失,因此法院在審理過程中,必須對之修正調整。另外法院釋放規範訊息的目標,也是為了展望將來,讓社會福利最大化。以過去經驗為基礎而制訂的法律工具,於未來案件的適用上,同樣可能會有思慮不周,或過於抽象的缺失。此時法律經濟學的個案分析方法,將能提升法院生產的規範資訊價值,使其更親和.對社會成員與更具說服力。 當法院認識到自己的社會任務與社會價值以後,也應努力提升規範訊息的資產價值,並降低社會成員在引用、辨識規範訊息時的成本。

並列摘要


Abstract This research is to aim at interpretation of trial activity in court in terms of information. This research is to explain the meaning, function and support condition of information, function and support condition, and then it applies two concepts of stereotyping and signaling to illustrate the methodology of information processing, which indicates the information processing is involved cost-benefit analysis. The different social members result in different cost and benefit due to the difference on the role they play. The method of information processing is accordingly different. The court attends the social activity and social event as the role of referee in terms of games. In contrast of player, the cost of the recognition of fact is high and the pursuit of benefit is reputation and authority, which truly affects information processing. The next stage is to analyze the features of trial activity in court from two different point of views of norm and real cases to ascertain the norm and the message which court delivers to society through trial activity is an asset with economic value and with objective standard for evaluation. Moreover, the method of production is based on the feature of role for court as referee in games to develop the law and jurisprudence in order to reduce the processing cost in production process. Therefore the law is the auxiliary instrument in the production process of norm in court. The law has been formed by adoption the “Inductive Method” by using the historical experience. The empirical part has been extracted to become the rule or order. The daily work in court is mainly to proceed the individual case and solve the problem. The law and jurisprudence of general case is unnecessarily able to concern its distinction entirely. Even the design of instrument for law itself has the drawback, so therefore in the trial process in court, these drawbacks and problems need to be adjusted and revised. In addition, the goal of releasing the normal information is for the vision to the future in order to maximization of social welfare. The law instrument might be lack of entire consideration or too abstract in the application of the future cases since it has established by the foundation of past experience. By this time the methodology of case studies of Law and Economics will enhance the value of normal information which court produces and make it more friendly and more convincing to social members. When the court realizes its social mission and social value, it should make its efforts to improve and enhance the value of standardized information and as well reduce the cost when social members apply and adopt the normal information. Keywords: Stereotyping; Signaling; Economics of Information; Law and Economics; Information; Rent Seeking ; Methodology of Law

參考文獻


鄭世仁(1994)“貝克的標籤理論對教育的啟示.”「教育資料與研究」 創刊號
熊秉元(2005).“十個「法學」問題?”法令月刊第56卷第9期. 1025-1035
熊秉元(2003).“正義和效率--法學和經濟學的對話.”法令月刊第54卷第7期. 74-81
熊秉元,“熊秉元漫步法律”時報出版 初版(2003)
劉瑞華譯,“制度、制度變遷與經濟成就”(North, D. C. “Institution, Institutional change and Economic Performance”) 時報文化出版,初版(1994)

被引用紀錄


林育丞(2009)。從資訊經濟觀點探討我國專利侵權訴訟定暫時狀態處分之審判活動〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.00879

延伸閱讀