私人參與行政任務及所生損害賠償之救濟途徑--以「促進民間參與公共建設法」為中心

Private participation in administrative commission and the remedies of damage--Focus on the”Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects”

楊忠霖(Chung-Lin Yang)

指導教授 ： 蔡宗珍

國立臺灣大學/法律學院/科際整合法律學研究所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.10100

摘要

「私人參與行政任務」之傳統由來已久，且隨著時代演進，得由私人參與之行政任務範疇亦不斷擴大。因我國法為公私法二元區分體系，而行政任務本在實現特定行政目的，其原則上應屬公法管轄之領域；然而亦得因其履行時之法律形式不同，而具有不同之法律屬性。
　　如何區分履行行政任務時之公私法形式本非易事，如再參雜「私人作為任務執行主體」此一要素，則更趨複雜。履行行政任務之過程中如發生損害賠償事件，究應成立國家賠償責任或民事侵權行為責任取決於任務履行時之法律形式；於「私人參與行政任務」此種公私法交錯之領域，除救濟途徑外，更須研究應以行政機關或私人為損害賠償責任主體，對於受害人皆構成請求上之困難。
　　因「私人參與行政任務」僅為一抽象之描述性用語，並不含有任何規範性功能或意義。故為解決上述問題，本文先嘗試以不同之區別標準，更加細緻化地理解「私人參與行政任務」此一概念內涵；再擇定符合本文研究目的之區別標準，將其作類型化區分，探討於不同類型下發生損害賠償事件時，受害人應如何正確尋求救濟。
　　其後本文以「促進民間參與公共建設法」第8條中所規定之民間參與方式為研究對象，即以本文先前建構私人參與行政任務之類型，分析促參法第8條各種參與方式之內容，探討各種參與方式於不同階段中產生損害賠償事件時應如何救濟。最後以高雄捷運系統做為實際案例分析，搭配大眾捷運法中與本文研究相關之條文分析，用以驗證本文先前之研究成果，並與台北捷運系統為一比較研究。

關鍵字

私人參與 ； 行政任務 ； 損害賠償 ； 國家賠償 ； 促進民間參與公共建設法

並列摘要

“Private Participation in administrative commission” has been a long tradition. As time goes by, the categories of administrative commission which allow private sectors to participate are getting larger. Because the law systems of our country are separated into two categories: public law system and private law system, and administrative commission aims to realize some administrative goal, it is generally regulated by the public law system. Nevertheless, the character of administrative commission is changeable due to the format of execution.
It has never been an easy work to tell the format of execution of administrative commission belongs to public or private law system. The problem becomes much more complicated when the subject of the execution of administrative commission is a private sector. When a damage case happens during the execution of administrative commission, deciding whether the civil law or the State Compensation Law should be applied depends on the format of execution of administrative commission. In this category “Private participation in the administrative commission” where public law and private law overlap, the victims need not only choose the right regulation but also judge the defendant should be the administrative institution or the private sector. This makes it difficult for them to file a suit.
“Private participation in the administrative commission” is an abstractive description without any regulatory function or meaning. In order to solve the mentioned problems, this thesis firstly uses different standard to understand the concept more precisely. Then we select the standard corresponding to the goal of this thesis to categorize it into several types. The correct remedies can be found by analyzing the traits of different types.
Moreover, this thesis focuses on article 8 of “Law for Promotion of Private Participation in infrastructure Projects”. Using the previous types to analyze the different methods of participation regulated in article 8, and then to choose the correct remedies in different periods of different types. Lastly, this thesis takes “Kaohsiung MRT” as an example. Comparing it to “Taipei MRT” and analyzing some articles of “Law of MRT” related to this thesis to verify the research outcome.

並列關鍵字

Private Participation ； administrative commission ； compensation ； State Compensation ； Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects

參考文獻

洪國欽，《促進民間參與公共建設法》，2008年1月。

羅明通，《國家賠償法上公權力概念之比較研究》，1993年12月。

林明昕，〈行政契約法上實務問題之回顧-兼論公、私法契約之區別〉，《國立中正大學法學集刊》，第18期，2005年4月。

葉張基，〈民間參與公共建設國家賠償責任之解構〉，《國立中正大學法學集刊》，第24期，2008年5月。

趙相文，《行業自治作為我國行政任務民營化之方法--以證券市場自律機制為例》，2005年台灣大學法律學研究所博士論文。