摘要
在政府大力推動民間參與公共建設的趨勢下，國內BOT案件數量呈現高度的成長。但是BOT案件的特性與傳統工程截然不同，就工程管理的角度其權責業已經過重新定義分配而有釐清的必要，本研究將由研討政府單位在公共建設應扮角色出發，以工程管理角度切入，透過現行品質與進度管理制度的一般原則探討，求得適切、合理、有效的BOT監督管理機制，並以主辦機關為對象擬具一個可行的品質進度管理機制建立原則。 本文以個案分析法為主，輔以相關法理研究文獻進行研討、參酌國外制度具體作法，釐清政府主辦機關在各種不同BOT專案條件中對品質進度管制應有之立場與具體作為。最後由前述的分析結果，研提一具體的考量原則，以提供政府在執行BOT過程中如何建立品質進度管理機制的參考。
並列摘要
Because of the Taiwan government’s policy to develop infrastructure with private finance approach,the number of BOT projects increases rapidly in these years. There are many aspects that are different between the traditional method and BOT menthod, and therefore, we should reconsider the construction management system. In this research, the first task is to identify the role of the government in infrastructure development, then to study the quality and progress control system currently used in practice, followed by finding out an appropriate and efficient mechanism for BOT mornitoring and management, and lastly to build the principles for government’s quality and progress control system. Case study is one of the most import methods in this reasch. The case study is to study the systems that are currently applied in different countries such as UK and Japan, and to identity the government position regarding quality and progress management in different BOT cases. According to the results of this pilot study, we will conclude some rules for government to estibilish the mechanism of BOT quality and process managemnt. mechanism for BOT mornitoring or management.and make up a practicable principle of quality and progress contoral system for government. Case study is the most import method for this reasch, and to assist with paper study and refere to the systems theose are runnig now just like systems of UK and JP ,and identity the government position in different BOT case should be or should do about quality and progress control. With the result of front analysis ,we will point out some rule for government to estibilish the mechanism for BOT quality and process control