透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.185.180
  • 學位論文

綜合營造廠針對各專業分包之治理策略:交易成本觀點

General Contractor’s Governance Strategies for the Subcontractors

指導教授 : 荷世平
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


在營建工程中,由於綜合營造廠所承攬之工程涵蓋範圍很廣,每一件工程也存在著各自的工程特性,不同的工程特性需考量的交易成本亦不盡相同。所以,為了能讓工程達到更好結果,在面對不同的情況時,營造廠應擁有不同的治理策略。 凡交易必考慮成本之高低,交易者亦會隨著成本的高低不同選擇相對應的治理策略。本篇論文將以交易成本為理論基礎,先是分析各工項所存在的工程特性,並將工程特性以交易成本特性表示,最後經運算後得到不同工項所存在之交易成本的分數。交易成本的高低會影響企業所選擇的治理模式,可能是內部化、市場化或是介於兩者之間的合作模式。 本篇論文主要參考了交易成本理論及治理策略等相關文獻,輔以企業訪談之形式與營建業界的進行經驗交流,統整各個專業人士的分享,去闡述綜合營造廠之現況並探討治理模式更多的可能性。

並列摘要


In the construction industry, general contractors undertake a wide range of engineering projects. Each professional subcontract also has its own engineering characteristics, and the transaction costs to be considered for different engineering characteristics are also different. Therefore, in order for the transaction to achieve better results in the end, the general contractor should have different governance models in the face of different situations. Every transaction must consider the level of cost, and traders will also choose the corresponding governance model according to the level of cost. This paper is based on transaction cost theory. First, analyze the engineering characteristics of each project. Second, the engineering characteristics are expressed as the characteristics of transaction costs. Finally, after calculation, the score of the transaction cost existing in each professional subcontracting is obtained. The level of transaction costs will affect the governance model chosen by the general contractor, which may be market, hierachy, or network. This paper mainly refers to relevant literature such as transaction cost theory and governance model. Exchange experience with the construction industry in the form of corporate interviews. Integrate the sharing of various professionals to explain the current situation of general contractors and explore more possibilities for governance models.

參考文獻


[1] R. H. Coase (1937), “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
[2] R. H. Coase (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
[3] Carl J. Dahlman (1979), “The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics, 22 (1), 141-162.
[4] Oliver E. Williamson (1975), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
[5] Oliver E. Williamson (1981), “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577.

延伸閱讀