透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.15.135.63
  • 學位論文

家庭社經背景對教育成就取得之影響-以自我教育抱負為中介變項

The Effect of Family Socioeconomic Background on Educational Attainment:Self-Educational Expectations as Mediators

指導教授 : 辛炳隆
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


既往研究指出縱使台灣歷經高等教育擴張,近年來家庭社經背景對子女教育成就的階級再製效果仍然續存。本研究運用台灣長期教育追蹤資料庫(TEPS)及其後續調查(TEPS-B)的資料,並以Boudon提出之教育機會不均等的次級效果作為理論基礎,探討家庭社經背景對學生自我教育抱負及教育成就的影響。實證結果顯示:(1)家庭社經地位對學生的教育抱負具有正向影響,並對學生不確定自我抱負的機率具顯著負向影響。(2)青少年時期的教育抱負對其教育成就取得具有顯著正向影響;不確定自我抱負的學生後來取得之教育成就低則於具明確抱負者。(3)家庭社經地位透過學生的自我教育抱負影響其教育成就取得。(4)分別檢視家庭社經背景各向度之影響,發現學生的自我教育抱負主要是受到父親教育程度及家庭收入的影響,至於家長職業地位對於自我教育抱負則不具顯著影響,符合文獻中教育抱負係透過模仿、採納及分析教育投資報酬率後形成的觀點。最後,依據上述研究結果對教育政策及後續研究方向提出相應建議。

並列摘要


Previous research has suggested that the class reproduction effect of family socioeconomic background on children's educational attainment had persisted in recent years despite the expansion of higher education in Taiwan. Using data from the Taiwan Educational Panel Survey and Beyond, and using Boudon's secondary effect of unequal educational opportunities as a theoretical basis, this study examines the effects of family socioeconomic background on students' self-educational aspirations and educational attainment. The empirical results show that (1) Family socioeconomic status has a positive effect on students' educational aspirations and a significant negative effect on students' uncertainty about their self-aspirations. (2) Educational aspirations during adolescence have a significant positive effect on educational attainment; students who were unsure of their self-aspirations had lower educational attainment than those with explicit aspirations. (3) Family socioeconomic status influences students' educational attainment through their self-education aspirations. (4) Examining the effects of each dimension of family socioeconomic background, I found that students' self-education aspirations are mainly influenced by father's education and family income, while parents' occupational status did not have a significant effect on self-education aspirations, which was in line with the literature. Finally, based on the above findings, I propose the following recommendations for education policy and subsequent research directions.

參考文獻


王如哲、楊瑩、劉秀曦、張珍瑋、黃家凱(2014)。〈我國推動經濟弱勢學生之人才培育政策分析與發展〉,《臺灣經濟論衡》12(2):60-82。
李敦仁、余民寧(2005)。〈社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證:以TEPS資料庫資料為例〉,《臺灣教育社會學研究》,5(2):1-47。
李敦仁(2007)。〈人力資本、財務資本、社會資本與教育成就關聯性之研究:Coleman 家庭資源理論模式之驗證〉,《教育與心理研究》30(3):111-141。
巫有鎰(1999)。〈影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制-以台北市和台東縣作比較〉,《教育研究集刊》(43):213-242。https://doi.org/10.6910/ber.199907_(43).0010 
巫麗雪(2015)。〈揠苗助長:父母期望與參與對子女教育藍圖的影響〉,《社會與區域發展學報》 4(2):35-66。

延伸閱讀