透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.235.196
  • 學位論文

考量發行人信用風險下結構型金融商品評價-以股價連動債為例

Structured Note Evaluation under Issuer's Credit Risk Concerned

指導教授 : 李存修
共同指導教授 : 王耀輝(Yaw-Huei Wang)
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


鑒於日益惡化之信用市場狀況,在無交易對手風險假設下進行之結構型金融商品評價,其理論價格將與市場實際價格產生歧異,致使評價的結果缺乏參考性與可信度。本文將以股權連動債為例,分別採用CIR模型與GJR-GARCH模型配適無風險利率和標的股價變異數之未來路徑,並根據商品報酬函數繁複多元之特色選用數值模擬法進行評價。此外,亦另建一外生性信用風險貼水評價模型,衍伸結構型信用風險模型(KMV)之核心概念,以美式二元賣權的形式量化發行人信用風險貼水,估算考量發行人信用風險下連動債之真實價值。

並列摘要


It is inappropriate to ignore counterparty risk when pricing structured products especially after the financial tsunami occurred in 2008. Motivated by these circumstances, we developed an exogenous model embedded the concept of Moody’s KMV model for evaluating the issuer’s credit risk premium under the framework of American binary put option, which is applicable to any kind of financial derivatives, and we select equity-linked structured notes for illustrator. The CIR model and GJR-GARCH model are employed in forecasting risk-free rate and variance paths for evaluating a proper fair price by using numerical methods. Fair price under issuer’s credit risk can then be estimated by deducting the premium from the default-free price.

參考文獻


12.Jarrow, R., D. Lando, and S. Turnbull (1997), A Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 481-523
1.Arora, N., J. Bohn, and F. Zhu, 2005, Reduced Form vs. Structural Models of Credit Risk: A Case Study of Three Models, Journal of Investment Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, 43-67
2.Black, F., 1976, Studies of stock price volatility changes, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, pp. 177–181 Business and Economics Statistics Section
3.Boyle, P. P., 1977, Options: A Monte Carlo Approach, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.4, No.3, 323-338
4.Brigo, D., and F. Mercurio, 2001, Interest Rate Models – Theory and Practice, Springer Finance, 56-60

延伸閱讀