This study provides an empirical study in the Taiwanese setting examining the value relevance of pension accounting information and the implication of actuarial assumption choices under Taiwan FAS 18 (TGAS 18) and fair-value-based IAS 19. Findings indicate that pension information recognized under TFAS 18 and IAS 19 is value relevant. However, discretionary pension assumption choices do not improve communication of private information. We also observe how financial statement management via managerial pension plan assumption choices is related to corporate governance effectiveness. Findings indicate that the opacity inherent in pension accounting guidance is likely exacerbated by weaker corporate governance.