This paper studies the information transmission between an informed sender and an uninformed receiver, where their “discernment” – the ability to discriminate states or actions – may be private information and can impose restrictions on their strategies. When agents’ discernment is common knowledge, the sender would never fully reveal his private information unless he is worse at discriminating states than the receiver. When agents’ discernment is private information, it is shown that indeterminacy of meaning might exist under certain situations.