論環境影響評估審查結論之變更–以「臺北市住六之六自辦市地重劃區案」為例

A Study on Amendments of Environmental Impact Assessment Reports：A Case Study on the Land Readjustment of No.6-6 Residential Area Project, Taipei City

賴寶汝(Bou-Ju Lai)

指導教授 ： 林明鏘

國立臺灣大學/進修推廣學院/事業經營法務碩士在職學位學程/碩士(2019年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201900585

摘要

環評影響評估法自84年開始施行，至今已有20餘年，近來政府或私人之開發行為仍可見到層出不窮的環境保護衝突爭議，特別是近幾年來幾件重大環評爭議引起高度關注，環境影響評估審查之公信力與專業更是受到嚴重的質疑，足見作為平衡環境保護與經濟開發手段，環評制度然有未竟之處，有檢討之必要。
本文主要經由個案資料蒐集作深入詳實的描述，再從個案的歷程了解個案之問題及處理方式，接著予以評價探討，最並試圖提出解決問題的方法或期盼能提出預防措施。個案主要的議題是變更環評審查結論之程序、違反環評審查結論。本論文共分為四章，第一章緒論，先闡述研究動機與目的，說明研究範圍方法及章節之安排，接著進行文獻回顧概述我國環評制度推動歷程及參考引用之文獻簡要介紹。第二章我國環境響評估審查制度，說明我國環境影響評估之作業程序、變更環評結論之程序及環評之監督追蹤實踐，作為後章節討論之基礎。第三章個案探討，先詳述案例之環評過程及行政訴訟歷程探討本案例問題之所在及檢討。最後第四章結論與建議，就前三章及個案究探討環評審查之爭議問題及處理，分析討論做一總結，提出具體建議。

關鍵字

環境影響評估 ； 審查結論 ； 行政處分 ； 行政訴訟

並列摘要

The Environmental Impact Assessment Act has been in force for more than 20 years since 1984. There are endless disputes over environmental protection issue for the projects and development of the government or private sectors, especially after a few high profile cases in recent years which have caused great concern to the credibility and professionalism of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) review. In order to strike a balance between protecting the environment as well as promoting economic growth, there is a need for the review of the EIA policy.
This article focuses on illustrating the cases in detail, which includes explaining the core issues and their solutions through examining the data collected for the cases. Evaluation will be given to the cases alongside with a few constructive proposals or preventive measures to solve the problems. The main issues are regarding the revision of procedure in EIA report finalization, and the violation in EIA findings. There are four chapters in this article; the first chapter is the introduction and it explains the purpose of the study, the scope of the research and the arrangement of the rest of the chapters. It also describes the overview of the development of the EIA policy with a few key references.
Chapter Two gives a further discussion about the existing EIA policy, including the standard procedure of EIA, amendments of EIA report finalization and the monitoring practices. These serve as the basis of discussion in the next chapter.
Chapter Three is a detailed study of the selected cases. It describes the procedure of the assessment and the litigation process of problematic cases. This is followed by discussing the root causes and to give an overall review on each case.
The final chapter concludes the cases and issues discussed in the previous chapter.

並列關鍵字

Environmental Impact Assessment ； EIA Repots ； Administrative Injunction ； Administrative Litigation

參考文獻

中文期刊論文

王服清（2015），〈論環境影響評估審查結論的法律性質與其撤銷後救濟類型〉，《科技法律評析》，8 期，頁1-56。

王毓正(2010)，〈司法判決撤銷環評審查結論之後，續行施工？─中科三期環評撤銷訴訟判決後之爭議問題〉，《台灣法學雜誌》，第147期，頁1-4。

王毓正（2010），〈我國環評史上首例撤銷判決：環評審查結論經撤銷無效抑或無效用之判決？/最高行九九判三O〉，《台灣法學雜誌》，149 期，頁145-158。

王毓正（2018），〈環評審查結論之條件與環評承諾於行政訴訟中相關爭議問題之探討〉，《興大法學》，23期。