透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.120.109
  • 學位論文

台灣銀行業經營績效分析-金控子銀行與非金控銀行之比較

The Empirical Study of the Performance of Taiwan’s Banks -Comparison between Subsidiary Banks of FHC and Banks of non-FHC

指導教授 : 謝德宗
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文旨在探討<金融控股公司法>通過至今,本國金控子銀行與非金控銀行的經營效率表現。研究期間為2002-2006年,以本國13家金控子銀行與30家非金控銀行為樣本,分別從收入面和資產面衡量銀行產出,設定適合的超越對數成本函數,利用panel data中的固定效果模型估計,並透過規模經濟與成本互補性指標,從成本面探討本國銀行業之經營效率,以瞭解金控公司成立是否能為銀行業帶來改革的契機與效率的提升。本研究之主要發現如下:(1)規模經濟:無論從營收面或資產面定義銀行產出,金控子銀行皆不具規模經濟,反觀非金控銀行則表現較佳。(2)成本互補性:若從營收面定義產出,手續費收入與其他產出具有互補性,非金控銀行則是以投資收入較具成本互補性;在資產面定義下,則無論金控子銀行或非金控銀行,只在傳統的放款與投資資產間具成本互補性。(3)無論從營收面或資產面定義產出,金控公司跨業種類數增加不會降低金控子銀行成本。(4)金控子銀行並不具有成本上的優勢,其營業成本較非金控銀行高。

並列摘要


This paper studies the performances of subsidiary banks of Financial Holding Company (FHC) and banks of non-FHC after the pass of Financial Holding Company Act. We apply a translog cost function, a panel data fix-effect model, different definitions for output (by revenue and asset), as well as economies of scale and economies of scope index, to analyze the cost efficiency of 13 subsidiary banks of FHC and 30 banks of non-FHC for 2002-2006 and to see whether the FHC Act can bring more benefits and improve efficiency for Taiwan’s bank industry. Our major findings are: (1) Economies of scale: the subsidiary banks of FHC don’t have economies of scale under the two different definitions for output. (2) Economies of scope: if output is defined by revenue, fee revenue has cost complementary for subsidiary banks of FHC while cost revenue has for banks of non-FHC. If output is defined by asset, only loan has cost complementary with investment asset for both. (3) For FHC, mergers and acquisitions cross different industries don’t improve the cost efficiency of its’ subsidiary banks. (4) On average, the subsidiary banks of FHC don’t reveal better cost efficiency than the banks of non-FHC.

參考文獻


6. 林炳文(2002),「台灣地區商業銀行合併之效率分析」,風險管理學報,第三卷第一期,頁1-21。
11. 許鈺珮、張錫介(2005),「金融控股公司法實施對台灣銀行業經營效率影響之分析」,金融風險管理季刊,2005,第一卷,第二期,33-56
1. Arshadi Nasser and Lawrence Edward C. (1987), “An Empirical Investigation of New Bank Performance ”, Journal of Banking and Fianace, Vol. 11, pp33-48.
3. Berger, A. N., D. Hancock andD. B. Humphrey, 1993, “Bank efficiency derived from the profit function,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 17, pp.317-347.
4. Daft, R.L. and N.B. Macintosh(1981),”A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, June, 26, 207-224.

被引用紀錄


陳奕中(2015)。金融海嘯後金控子銀行獲利之實證分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02723
林昇豪(2008)。台灣金融機構併購方式之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.00053
李秀月(2011)。商業銀行的資本適足程度、所有權類型與經營績效之研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-1903201314421828
張寶文(2011)。購併與非購併銀行效率、績效衡量與決定因素之探討-台灣金融產業的實證研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1511201110381348
嚴曉萍(2013)。台灣金控與非金控銀行效率與生產力─金融風暴前後之實證探討〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314042048

延伸閱讀