透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.147.87
  • 學位論文

中國對國際矚目事件的形象管理:以2008年西藏事件及汶川大地震為例

Research on Chinese government's image management: the 2008 Tibetan unrest and Wenchuan earthquake as case studies.

指導教授 : 陳明通

摘要


中國在2008年發生了西藏事件及汶川大地震,中國政府透過其掌握的媒介包括新華社、人民日報等對事件加以定調;而另一方面,歐美各國媒體也對西藏事件及汶川大地震報導進而影響外國民眾對中國形象的認知。一般認為,西藏事件對中國形象傷害很大,而汶川大地震則讓中國形象得以修補,外國對中國的印象變好。 本論文以Horold Lasswell的「Who says what in which channel to whom with what effect?」為分析架構,討論中國對國際矚目事件的形象管理,釐清中國在進行國際傳播的機關、內容與媒介等,並透過《人民日報》海外版和《紐約時報》(The New York Times)對2個案報導的內容分析,瞭解到中國在西藏事件的形象管理不是全然無效;而外國在在汶川大地震後對中國印象變佳,亦不全是中國政府形象管理的結果。進一步來說,中國對其形象有「說」也有「不說」,亦即中國對傳播主題有其主動及被動,不是所有正面議題都願意對外傳播。另外,研究也發現,中國自己形塑出的中國形象,有從超級正面、光明,逐漸轉為中立的趨勢,這樣的轉變也使得中國自己認知的中國形象與外國認知的中國形象差距縮小。

並列摘要


This thesis attempts to deal with how the Chinese government manipulates its official media outlets such as Xinhua News Agency and People's Daily overseas edition to secure or set the tone for its national image. Citing the 2008 Tibetan unrest and the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake as case studies, it is widely believed that the Western media has played an essential role in influencing the western perception regarding the Chinese government’s policies in handling these two incidents. The analysis framework of this paper is based on the theory of the renowned scholar in the political science, Horold Lasswell: Who says what in which channel to whom with what effect? We seek to employ his approach to discuss how Chinese government copes with its domestic events which draw attention in the international stage by examining its dissemination medium and methods. Having observed from analyzing the reports made by the New York Times and the People’s Daily overseas edition, a conclusion can be drawn that Beijing’s stance on handling this issue varies mainly depending on how it perceives the situation. More specifically, the Chinese government tends to play dual roles, namely, active and passive, when it comes to showcasing its national image. From this perspective, it can be observed that the image gap between the Chinese government and the Western media seems to narrow.

參考文獻


———,2008,〈中國的「輿論戰」:理論發展與操控模式〉,《全球政治評論》,22:33-64。
林佳龍,2004,〈中國的國家戰略與對外策略〉,林佳龍(編),《未來中國:退化的極權主義》,台北:時報文化,209-262
寇健文、梁書瑗,2008,〈中共領導人權力消長在黨報新聞照片上的呈現〉,《政治科學論叢》,38:35-70
莊國平,2008,〈國家形象與公眾外交:中共新國家形象建構之分析〉,《復興崗學報》,92:317-346
劉昌鑫,2008,《中國輿論戰對和諧外交的影響》,台北:淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文

被引用紀錄


林明萱(2012)。胡錦濤時期中共之宣傳政策(2003-2008)- 張藝謀個案研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10615
陳玟如(2011)。中國媒體建構下的臺灣印象焦點分析─以中央電視臺《海峽兩岸》節目為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.00094

延伸閱讀