透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.133.228
  • 學位論文

都市居民鄉村長宿休閒態度之研究

Study of the Urban Residents’ Attitude toward Long Stay in Rural Area

指導教授 : 王俊豪
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究的目的,在於探討國內居民鄉村長宿休閒態度的內容,以及可能造成鄉村長宿休閒態度差別與變化的因素。本研究採用健康利用行為模型的「傾向因素」、「使能因素」與「需要因素」為研究架構,並分別結合相關的休閒理論進行探討。本研究將使用量表和問卷,透過親友的協助進行資料蒐集。本研究以台北、桃園地區為範圍,先發放30份問卷進行預試,項目分析後再發放440份問卷進行正式調查,最後回收418份問卷,當中包含252份有效問卷,有效比率約60.29%。在此階段,本研究先進行量表的信度分析與因素分析,再進行研究變項的獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析。 本研究的重要結果列示如後:(1)研究對象的鄉村長宿休閒態度包含「鄉村長宿之活動」與「鄉村長宿之服務」二個因素構面,直交轉軸後的解釋變異量依序為27.255%、24.262%,共計51.517%;(2)「傾向因素」當中,個人背景特性變項僅婚姻狀態、目前居住方式對鄉村長宿休閒態度的比較有顯著差異,其他變項皆無顯著差異,另外,目前休閒型態之調查項目中,「運動」、「閱讀」、「觀光旅遊」、「志工工作」對鄉村長宿休閒態度的比較存在差異;(3)「使能因素」當中,經濟資源水準的變項除子女數外,其餘變項皆未與都市居民的鄉村長宿休閒態度,產生顯著的正相關性,經濟來源管道之調查項目中,僅「儲蓄利息投資」對都市居民鄉村長宿休閒態度的比較存在顯著的差異性;(4)「需要因素」當中,退休規劃變項僅退休生涯規劃之調查項目中的「傳授知識或才藝」,對鄉村長宿休閒態度之比較無顯著的差異,對鄉村之正面印象之調查項目中,「居民富有人情味」、「生活悠閒」、「自然風光優美」、「能使心情舒暢愉悅」、「農村、漁村的風貌吸引人」,對都市居民鄉村長宿休閒態度的比較,皆有明顯的差異性,但「農村、漁村的風貌吸引人」達到的顯著水準較低,預計退休時間則與都市居民的鄉村長宿休閒態度間,存在顯著的負相關性。量表內容與不同特性之受訪者想法的異同或樣本規模,可能是上述結果的成因。 整體而言,「傾向因素」當中的目前休閒型態,以及「需要因素」當中的退休規劃變項、預計退休時間、對鄉村之正面印象皆與鄉村長宿休閒態度存在關聯。本研究亦據此對官方單位提供態度說服、客源尋找方面的建議,對民間業者提供行業投入的建議,對後續研究提供研究範圍、對象、方法的建議。

並列摘要


Abstract The purpose of this study is to discover the context of the internal residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area, and examine the variables that could make the attitude toward Long Stay in rural area be different and change, to do this, the study will use behavior model of health service and combine the theories about leisure. The study will use the scale and the questionnaire, handling the data collection through relatives and friends. The study takes Taipei and Taoyuan region for the range, sending 30 questionnaires for pretest firstly, and then sending 440 questionnaires for test after item analysis, and retrieving 418 questionnaires which include 252 effective questionnaires, the effective percent is 60.29%. In this stage, the study will handle confidence analysis and factor analysis for testing the scale firstly, and then handling T-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The important results are the following points: (1) the subject’s attitude toward Long Stay in rural area including “Activities of Long Stay in Rural Area”, “Services of Long Stay in Rural Area”, all are two factor aspects, and the factor percent is 27.255% and 24.262%, all are 51.517%; (2) In predisposing component, on one hand, the individual social background variables can’t make the significant difference on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area except marital status and recent live pattern, on the other hand, the survey items of recent leisure pattern which make the significant difference on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area are “movement”, “reading”, “sightseeing traveling”, and “will labor work”; (3)In enabling component, on one hand, economic resource level can’t make the significant positive correlation on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area , except child number on the other hand, the survey items of economic resource pipe, only “saving-interest-invest” can make the significant on the on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area; (4)In needing component, only “introduction knowledge or skill” in the survey items of retirement career plan in the retirement plan variables can’t make the significant difference on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area, the survey items of positive impression toward rural area which can make the significant difference on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area are ” Inhabitant rich touch of humanity”, “life of leisure ”, “natural sightseeing of beauty”, “can cause to have ease of mind joyfully”, and “the countryside, the fishing village style is appealing”, but “the countryside, the fishing village style is appealing” has the lower significant level, on the other hand, estimated retirement time can make the significant negative correlation on the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area. Whether the context of the scale is different from what subject think or the scale of the sample might be the reason of the above-mentioned result. By and large, the recent leisure pattern in predisposing component, the retirement plan variables, estimated retirement time and positive impression toward rural area in needing component are related to the urban residents’ attitude toward Long Stay in rural area. The study also offer the advice on the attitude persuasion and guest discovery for the governmental unit; on the profession imvolvement for the non-govermental unit; on the scope, skill, and subject for the following study.

參考文獻


王怡方(2005)。台灣老人住宅的過去、現在與未來發展。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市。
郭煥成(2007)。鄉村旅遊發展現狀、特徵與途徑[電子版]。鄉村旅遊研究,1(1),1-27。
陳仁惠、王惠玄、劉燕瑩(2004)。都會區中齡者生活型態對購買退休社區照護態度以及行為傾向之影響-以台北市北區居民為例[電子版]。醫務管理期刊,5(2),187-207。
蕭惠文(2006)。台灣老人對高齡者住宅的需求。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北市。
鄭健雄、施欣儀(2007)。新鄉村主義與鄉村旅遊發展[電子版]。鄉村旅遊研究,1(2):1-17。

被引用紀錄


陳玉燕(2012)。桃園縣國小教師老化態度、活躍老化學習認知與活躍老化學習需求之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613505141

延伸閱讀