我國大陸經貿政策變遷之研究-從「積極開放、有效管理」到「積極管理、有效開放」

Study on the Change of Taiwan's Economic and Trade Policy towards Mainland China －from“ Proactive Liberalization with Effective Management”to“Proactive Management with Effective Liberalization”

翁淑貞(Shu-Cheng Weng)

指導教授 ： 陳明通

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/國家發展研究所/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.02327

摘要

中文摘要

由於兩岸特殊的關係，兩岸經貿關係究竟是應「保持距離」，還是要「加強聯繫」？各界對此問題的看法極為分歧，而我國對大陸經貿政策應如何調整，才能使台灣保持競爭優勢，一直是各界高度關注的議題。
本文藉由歷史制度論對制度變遷之歷史系絡的描繪，探討我國對大陸經貿政策變遷的脈絡，以瞭解影響政策變遷的因素。
在「戒急用忍」政策之前，我國大陸經貿政策乃是配合產業發展需求，採取漸近方式，逐步解除管制。直到「戒急用忍」的提出，對台商赴中國大陸投資予以限制，政策始朝向「緊縮」。而從「戒急用忍」改為「積極開放、有效管理」，政策又朝向「開放」的步調；而從「積極開放、有效管理」改為「積極管理、有效開放」，政策是超越「開放」或「緊縮」，著重在落實管理機制，「開放」的前提是必須做好「管理」。
由於兩岸存在「主權」之爭，中共到目前仍不放棄武力攻台，並堅持「一中」的談判原則，使得兩岸關係無法朝向正常化發展，因而政府隨著情勢的變化調整大陸經貿政策，總以國家安全為最優先考量。但面對全球化競爭，政府仍必須以務實的態度面對企業經營中國大陸市場的需求，將中國大陸市場視為企業佈局全球的一環。另外對於開放措施，必須以漸進的方式進行，讓相關的配套措施有漸次建構的時間，同時也必須配合有效的管理機制，才能兼顧經濟發展及國家安全。

關鍵字

大陸經貿政策 ； 歷史制度論 ； 「積極開放、有效管理」 ； 「積極管理、有效開放」

並列摘要

Abstract

Due to the special relation between cross–strait, should there be “distance” or “reinforced contact” for the economic and trading activities between cross–strait? Opinions towards the question varied. How does the government adjust the economic and trade policy towards Mainland China to maintain its competitive advantage? It is a question frequently asked.
The impact of Historical Institutionalism on the change of regime is introduced in this study to understand the Change of Taiwan's economic and trade policy towards Mainland China and to understand the influential elements to the policy change.
Before the “No Haste,Be Patient” policy enforced, Taiwan's economic and trade Policy towards Mainland China was to support the demand of industrial change gradually and with restriction lifted gradually. After the “No Haste,Be Patient” policy proposed, the investment of Taiwanese in Mainland China was restricted and “tightened.” The “No Haste,Be Patient” policy was replaced by “Proactive Liberalization with Effective Managemen” that was relatively a “loosen up” policy. While the policy was once again changed from “Proactive Liberalization with Effective Managemen” to “Proactive Management with Effective Liberalization” the policy is no longer a question of “open” or “tightened” but with a focus on substantiating management mechanism and the “open” policy cannot live without proper “management.”
Due to the fight over “national sovereignty” between cross–strait, Chinese Communists have not yet given up arm threat against Taiwan and has insisted on the “One China” policy; therefore, a normal development between cross–strait is impossible.Taiwanese government has the Economy & Trading policy for China adjusted with the concern of national security in mind. While facing a global competition, Taiwanese government is obliged to face up to the demand of businesses for Chinese market and considers Chinese market part of its globalization strategy. Taiwanese government is to have Chinese market opened up gradually and to have the supporting measures constructed in an orderly manner; also, to have both economic development and national security protected with effective management mechanism.

並列關鍵字

Economic and Trade policy Towards Mainland China ； Historical Institutionalism ； Proactive Liberalization with Effective Managemen ； Proactive Management with Effective Liberalization

參考文獻

李紀珠，2002.08.23，〈兩岸經貿與國家安全〉，《中央日報》。

李瓊莉，1999.02，〈經濟安全概念在亞太地區的發展〉，《問題與研究》，第38卷，第2期，頁39~53。

林昱君，2006.09〈中國「十一五」貿易發展戰略之調整〉，《經濟前瞻》，頁76-81。

高 長，2002.03，〈兩岸加入WTO後，台灣對大陸經貿政策的因應與挑戰〉，《兩岸共同市場基金會通訊》，第2期。

童振源，2000.030.5，〈評陳水扁經濟安全發展戰略的兩岸經貿政策〉，《經濟前瞻》。